Excess of Health Care Use in General Practice and of Comorbid Chronic Conditions in Cancer Patients Compared to Controls

Overview

Journal BMC Fam Pract

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Health Services
Public Health

Date 2012 Jun 21

PMID 22712888

Citations 21

Authors

Lea Jabaaij

Marjan van den Akker

Francois G Schellevis

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The number of cancer patients and the number of patients surviving initial treatments is expected to rise. Traditionally, follow-up monitoring takes place in secondary care. The contribution of general practice is less visible and not clearly defined.This study aimed to compare healthcare use in general practice of patients with cancer during the follow-up phase compared with patients without cancer. We also examined the influence of comorbid conditions on healthcare utilisation by these patients in general practice.

Methods: We compared health care use of N=8,703 cancer patients with an age and gender-matched control group of patients without cancer from the same practice. Data originate from the Netherlands Information Network of General Practice (LINH), a representative network consisting of 92 general practices with 350,000 enlisted patients. Health care utilisation was assessed using data on contacts with general practice, prescription and referral rates recorded between 1/1/2001 and 31/12/2007. The existence of additional comorbid chronic conditions (ICPC coded) was taken into account.

Results: Compared to matched controls, cancer patients had more contacts with their GP-practice (19.5 vs. 11.9, p<.01), more consultations with the GP (3.5 vs. 2.7, p<.01), more home visits (1.6 vs. 0.4, p<.01) and they got more medicines prescribed (18.7 vs. 11.6, p<.01) during the follow-up phase. Cancer patients more often had a chronic condition than their matched controls (52% vs. 44%, p<.01). Having a chronic condition increased health care use for both patients with and without cancer. Cancer patients with a comorbid condition had the highest health care use.

Conclusion: We found that cancer patients in the follow-up phase consulted general practice more often and suffered more often from comorbid chronic conditions, compared to patients without cancer. It is expected that the number of cancer patients will rise in the years to come and that primary health care professionals will be more involved in follow-up care. Care for comorbid chronic conditions, communication between specialists and GPs, and coordination of tasks then need special attention.

Citing Articles

Explaining the Nurses' Spiritual Needs in the Oncology Department: A Qualitative Study.

Mosavizadeh S, Bahrami M, Maghami-Mehr A, Torkan M, Mehdipoorkorani L Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2024; 29(1):98-104.

PMID: 38333340 PMC: 10849283. DOI: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_84_23.

Home-built environment interventions and inflammation biomarkers: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Hernandez-Garcia E, Chrysikou E, Nekhlyudov L, Gilroy D, Ordonez-Mena J BJGP Open. 2022; 6(4).

PMID: 36137647 PMC: 9904785. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0104.

Cancer-specific mortality in breast cancer patients with hypothyroidism: a UK population-based study.

McVicker L, Cardwell C, McIntosh S, McMenamin U Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022; 195(2):209-221.

PMID: 35908274 PMC: 9374643. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06674-5.

Type of treatment, symptoms and patient satisfaction play an important role in primary care contact during prostate cancer follow-up: results from the population-based PROFILES registry.

Wollersheim B, van Eenbergen M, van Asselt K, Fossion L, Koldewijn E, Oddens J BMC Fam Pract. 2021; 22(1):218.

PMID: 34736413 PMC: 8569955. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01567-w.

The perceptions of nurses, patients and family members regarding nurses' empathetic behaviours towards patients suffering from cancer: a descriptive qualitative study.

Ashouri E, Taleghani F, Memarzadeh M, Saburi M, Babashahi F J Res Nurs. 2021; 23(5):428-443.

PMID: 34394455 PMC: 7932341. DOI: 10.1177/1744987118756945.

References

Holtedahl K, Norum J, Anvik T, Richardsen E . Do cancer patients benefit from short-term contact with a general practitioner following cancer treatment? A randomised, controlled study. Support Care Cancer. 2005; 13(11):949-56. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-005-0869-5. View

Blaauwbroek R, Barf H, Groenier K, Kremer L, van der Meer K, Tissing W . Family doctor-driven follow-up for adult childhood cancer survivors supported by a web-based survivor care plan. J Cancer Surviv. 2011; 6(2):163-71. PMC: 3321136. DOI: 10.1007/s11764-011-0207-5. View

Khan N, Ward A, Watson E, Rose P . Consulting and prescribing behaviour for anxiety and depression in long-term survivors of cancer in the UK. Eur J Cancer. 2010; 46(18):3339-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.07.035. View

Roorda C, de Bock G, van der Veen W, Lindeman A, Jansen L, van der Meer K . Role of the general practitioner during the active breast cancer treatment phase: an analysis of health care use. Support Care Cancer. 2011; 20(4):705-14. PMC: 3297746. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-011-1133-9. View

de Bock G, Musters R, Bos H, Schroder C, Mourits M, de Jong-van den Berg L . Psychotropic medication during endocrine treatment for breast cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2011; 20(7):1533-40. PMC: 3360854. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-011-1242-5. View

Johansson B, Berglund G, Hoffman K, Glimelius B, Sjoden P . The role of the general practitioner in cancer care and the effect of an extended information routine. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2000; 18(3):143-8. DOI: 10.1080/028134300453331. View

Nazarian J . Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation after treatment for lung cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2003; 5(1):75-82. DOI: 10.1007/s11864-004-0008-4. View

Anvik T, Holtedahl K, Mikalsen H . "When patients have cancer, they stop seeing me"--the role of the general practitioner in early follow-up of patients with cancer--a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2006; 7:19. PMC: 1435903. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-19. View

Liu W, Vyas A, Escalante C, Weiser M, Wang J, Geraci J . Results of general internal medicine consultations for diabetes mellitus in 283 cancer patients. Am J Med Sci. 2007; 333(5):276-9. DOI: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31805340d4. View

10.

Siragusa S, Arcara C, Malato A, Anastasio R, Valerio M, Fulfaro F . Home therapy for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2005; 16 Suppl 4:iv136-139. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdi923. View

11.

Chait I, Glynne-Jones R, Thomas S . A pilot study exploring the effect of discharging cancer survivors from hospital follow-up on the workload of general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 1998; 48(430):1241-3. PMC: 1410188. View

12.

Grunfeld E . Looking beyond survival: how are we looking at survivorship?. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(32):5166-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.5953. View

13.

Jiwa M, Saunders C, Thompson S, Rosenwax L, Sargant S, Khong E . Timely cancer diagnosis and management as a chronic condition: opportunities for primary care. Med J Aust. 2008; 189(2):78-82. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01921.x. View

14.

Kurtz M, Kurtz J, Given C, Given B . Utilization of services among elderly cancer patients--relationship to age, symptoms, physical functioning, comorbidity, and survival status. Ethn Dis. 2005; 15(2 Suppl 2):S17-22. View

15.

Ageno W, Grimwood R, Limbiati S, Dentali F, Steidl L, Wells P . Home-treatment of deep vein thrombosis in patients with cancer. Haematologica. 2005; 90(2):220-4. View

16.

Macleod U, Ross S, Twelves C, George W, Gillis C, Watt G . Primary and secondary care management of women with early breast cancer from affluent and deprived areas: retrospective review of hospital and general practice records. BMJ. 2000; 320(7247):1442-5. PMC: 27387. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7247.1442. View

17.

Khan N, Ward A, Watson E, Austoker J, Rose P . Long-term survivors of adult cancers and uptake of primary health services: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2007; 44(2):195-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.10.005. View

18.

Koroukian S, Murray P, Madigan E . Comorbidity, disability, and geriatric syndromes in elderly cancer patients receiving home health care. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(15):2304-10. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.1567. View

19.

Dworkind M, Towers A, Murnaghan D, Guibert R, Iverson D . Communication between family physicians and oncologists: qualitative results of an exploratory study. Cancer Prev Control. 1999; 3(2):137-44. View

20.

Sisler J, McCormack-Speak P . Bridging the gap between primary care and the cancer system: the UPCON Network of CancerCare Manitoba. Can Fam Physician. 2009; 55(3):273-8. PMC: 2654827. View