» Articles » PMID: 26140835

Labor and Delivery Experiences of Mothers with Suspected Large Babies

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2015 Jul 5
PMID 26140835
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To characterize the prevalence of and factors associated with clinicians' prenatal suspicion of a large baby; and to determine whether communicating fetal size concerns to patients was associated with labor and delivery interventions and outcomes.

Methods: We examined data from women without a prior cesarean who responded to Listening to Mothers III, a nationally representative survey of women who had given birth between July 2011 and June 2012 (n = 1960). We estimated the effect of having a suspected large baby (SLB) on the odds of six labor and delivery outcomes.

Results: Nearly one-third (31.2%) of women were told by their maternity care providers that their babies might be getting "quite large"; however, only 9.9% delivered a baby weighing ≥4000 g (19.7% among mothers with SLBs, 5.5% without). Women with SLBs had increased adjusted odds of medically-induced labor (AOR 1.9; 95% CI 1.4-2.6), attempted self-induced labor (AOR 1.9; 95% CI 1.4-2.7), and use of epidural analgesics (AOR 2.0; 95% CI 1.4-2.9). No differences were noted for overall cesarean rates, although women with SLBs were more likely to ask for (AOR 4.6; 95% CI 2.8-7.6) and have planned (AOR 1.8; 95% CI 1.0-4.5) cesarean deliveries. These associations were not affected by adjustment for gestational age and birthweight.

Conclusions For Practice: Only one in five US women who were told that their babies might be getting quite large actually delivered infants weighing ≥4000 g. However, the suspicion of a large baby was associated with an increase in perinatal interventions, regardless of actual fetal size.

Citing Articles

Fetal macrosomia in home and birth center births in the United States: Maternal, fetal, and newborn outcomes.

Pillai S, Cheyney M, Everson C, Bovbjerg M Birth. 2020; 47(4):409-417.

PMID: 33058197 PMC: 8923081. DOI: 10.1111/birt.12506.


Cesarean section on a rise-Does advanced maternal age explain the increase? A population register-based study.

Rydahl E, Declercq E, Juhl M, Maimburg R PLoS One. 2019; 14(1):e0210655.

PMID: 30677047 PMC: 6345458. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210655.

References
1.
Saisto T, Toivanen R, Salmela-Aro K, Halmesmaki E . Therapeutic group psychoeducation and relaxation in treating fear of childbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006; 85(11):1315-9. DOI: 10.1080/00016340600756920. View

2.
Vendittelli F, Riviere O, Breart G . Is prenatal identification of fetal macrosomia useful?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012; 161(2):170-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.01.010. View

3.
Chauhan S, Grobman W, Gherman R, Chauhan V, Chang G, Magann E . Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193(2):332-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.020. View

4.
Blackwell S, Refuerzo J, Chadha R, Carreno C . Overestimation of fetal weight by ultrasound: does it influence the likelihood of cesarean delivery for labor arrest?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 200(3):340.e1-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.12.043. View

5.
. AIUM Practice Guideline for the performance of an antepartum obstetric ultrasound examination. J Ultrasound Med. 2003; 22(10):1116-25. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2003.22.10.1116. View