Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Researchers have traditionally worked within either a quantitative or a qualitative paradigm. The quantitative paradigm is dominant in biomedical research. This paper describes the differences between quantitative and qualitative methods and discusses the limitations of research which involves one approach to the exclusion of the other. The possible advantages of the combined use of both types of methods are outlined and highlighted with examples from the medical literature.
Identifying how GPs spend their time and the obstacles they face: a mixed-methods study.
Sinnott C, Moxey J, Marjanovic S, Leach B, Hocking L, Ball S Br J Gen Pract. 2021; 72(715):e148-e160.
PMID: 34844920 PMC: 8813099. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0357.
Agarwal G, Gaber J, Richardson J, Mangin D, Ploeg J, Valaitis R Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019; 5:118.
PMID: 31673398 PMC: 6815451. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-019-0504-8.
Patel R, Green W, Shahzad M, Larkin C JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015; 3(3):e80.
PMID: 26272411 PMC: 4705011. DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.4388.
Phillips C, Dwan K, Hepworth J, Pearce C, Hall S BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14:559.
PMID: 25407663 PMC: 4245737. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-014-0559-4.
Encouraging innovation, unintended consequences, and group-level research.
Williams R, Stange K, Phillips W, Acheson L, Balasubramanian B, Bayliss E Ann Fam Med. 2013; 11(3):200-2.
PMID: 23690316 PMC: 3659133. DOI: 10.1370/afm.1533.