» Articles » PMID: 21192206

Appreciative Inquiry for Quality Improvement in Primary Care Practices

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2010 Dec 31
PMID 21192206
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To test the effect of an Appreciative Inquiry (AI) quality improvement strategy on clinical quality management and practice development outcomes. Appreciative inquiry enables the discovery of shared motivations, envisioning a transformed future, and learning around the implementation of a change process.

Methods: Thirty diverse primary care practices were randomly assigned to receive an AI-based intervention focused on a practice-chosen topic and on improving preventive service delivery (PSD) rates. Medical-record review assessed change in PSD rates. Ethnographic field notes and observational checklist analysis used editing and immersion/crystallization methods to identify factors affecting intervention implementation and practice development outcomes.

Results: The PSD rates did not change. Field note analysis suggested that the intervention elicited core motivations, facilitated development of a shared vision, defined change objectives, and fostered respectful interactions. Practices most likely to implement the intervention or develop new practice capacities exhibited 1 or more of the following: support from key leader(s), a sense of urgency for change, a mission focused on serving patients, health care system and practice flexibility, and a history of constructive practice change.

Conclusions: An AI approach and enabling practice conditions can lead to intervention implementation and practice development by connecting individual and practice strengths and motivations to the change objective.

Citing Articles

Changing Our Mental and Emotional Trajectory (COMET): The Feasibility and Acceptability of a Rural Community-Based Strategy to Prevent Mental and Emotional Health Problems.

Zittleman L, Felzien M, Curcija K, Bennett C, Bennett K, Carrica 3rd J J Prim Care Community Health. 2025; 16:21501319251317337.

PMID: 39907546 PMC: 11800243. DOI: 10.1177/21501319251317337.


Implementation strategies for large scale quality improvement initiatives in primary care settings: a qualitative assessment.

Goldberg D, Owens-Jasey C, Haghighat S, Kavalloor S BMC Prim Care. 2023; 24(1):242.

PMID: 37978433 PMC: 10655333. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02200-8.


Systematic review and narrative synthesis of the impact of Appreciative Inquiry in healthcare.

Merriel A, Wilson A, Decker E, Hussein J, Larkin M, Barnard K BMJ Open Qual. 2022; 11(2).

PMID: 35710130 PMC: 9204436. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001911.


Building Positive Organizations: A Typology of Positive Psychology Interventions.

van Woerkom M Front Psychol. 2021; 12:769782.

PMID: 34867675 PMC: 8637171. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769782.


Outcomes, mechanisms and contextual factors of positive psychology interventions for health workers: a systematic review of global evidence.

Kletter M, Harris B, Brown C Hum Resour Health. 2021; 19(1):24.

PMID: 33639979 PMC: 7910793. DOI: 10.1186/s12960-021-00564-5.


References
1.
Kottke T, Brekke M, Solberg L . Making "time" for preventive services. Mayo Clin Proc. 1993; 68(8):785-91. DOI: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)60638-7. View

2.
Ruhe M, Carter C, Litaker D, Stange K . A systematic approach to practice assessment and quality improvement intervention tailoring. Qual Manag Health Care. 2009; 18(4):268-77. DOI: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e3181bee268. View

3.
Lawrence R, Mickalide A, Kamerow D, Woolf S . Report of the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 1990; 263(3):436-7. View

4.
Goodwin M, Zyzanski S, Zronek S, Ruhe M, Weyer S, Konrad N . A clinical trial of tailored office systems for preventive service delivery. The Study to Enhance Prevention by Understanding Practice (STEP-UP). Am J Prev Med. 2001; 21(1):20-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00310-5. View

5.
Bobiak S, Zyzanski S, Ruhe M, Carter C, Ragan B, Flocke S . Measuring practice capacity for change: a tool for guiding quality improvement in primary care settings. Qual Manag Health Care. 2009; 18(4):278-84. DOI: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e3181bee2f5. View