Models for Patterning Primary Embryonic Body Axes: The Role of Space and Time
Overview
Reproductive Medicine
Authors
Affiliations
Models for the generation and interpretation of spatial patterns are discussed. Crucial for these processes is an intimate link between self-enhancing and antagonistic reactions. For spatial patterning, long-ranging antagonistic reactions are required that restrict the self-enhancing reactions to generate organizing regions. Self-enhancement is also required for a permanent switch-like activation of genes. This self-enhancement is antagonized by the mutual repression of genes, making sure that in a particular cell only one gene of a set of possible genes become activated - a long range inhibition in the 'gene space'. The understanding how the main body axes are initiated becomes more straightforward if the evolutionary ancestral head/brain pattern and the trunk pattern is considered separately. To activate a specific gene at particular concentration of morphogenetic gradient, observations are compatible with a systematic and time-requiring 'promotion' from one gene to the next until the local concentration is insufficient to accomplish a further promotion. The achieved determination is stable against a fading of the morphogen, as required to allow substantial growth. Minor modifications lead to a purely time-dependent activation of genes; both mechanisms are involved to pattern the anteroposterior axis. A mutual activation of cell states that locally exclude each other accounts for many features of the segmental patterning of the trunk. A possible scenario for the evolutionary invention of segmentation is discussed that is based on a reemployment of interactions involved in asexual reproduction.
Fritzsch B, Glover J Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 12:1340157.
PMID: 38533086 PMC: 10963430. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1340157.
Booth K, Azaiez H, Jahan I, Smith R, Fritzsch B Front Genet. 2018; 9:156.
PMID: 29868110 PMC: 5951964. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00156.
Jahan I, Elliott K, Fritzsch B Integr Comp Biol. 2018; 58(2):351-365.
PMID: 29718413 PMC: 6104702. DOI: 10.1093/icb/icy019.
Bostrom J, Sramkova Z, Salasova A, Johard H, Mahdessian D, Fedr R PLoS One. 2017; 12(12):e0188772.
PMID: 29228002 PMC: 5724894. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188772.
Sonic hedgehog antagonists reduce size and alter patterning of the frog inner ear.
Zarei S, Zarei K, Fritzsch B, Elliott K Dev Neurobiol. 2017; 77(12):1385-1400.
PMID: 29030893 PMC: 5693645. DOI: 10.1002/dneu.22544.