» Articles » PMID: 2610499

In Vitro Activities and Targets of Three Cephem Antibiotics Against Haemophilus Influenzae

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1989 Nov 1
PMID 2610499
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The antimicrobial activities of cefixime, cefpodoxime, and ceftibuten were determined with 18 ampicillin-susceptible (Amps), 13 ampicillin-resistant beta-lactamase-producing (AmprBLP), and 7 ampicillin-resistant non-beta-lactamase-producing (AmprNBLP) strains of Haemophilus influenzae. An effect of inoculum density on apparent MIC, the bactericidal activity of these agents, and the targets of the three cephems were determined. The MICs of cefixime, cefpodoxime, and ceftibuten for 90% of the Amps and AmprBLP isolates were 0.04, 0.08, and 0.08 microgram/ml, respectively. In contrast, the MICs for 90% of the AmprNBLP strains were 0.96, 1.92, and 7.68 micrograms/ml. No significant inoculum effect was observed for any group of strains comparing inocula of 10(3) and 10(5) CFU, whereas only the AmprNBLP isolates showed a marked effect at an inoculum of 10(6) CFU. Although bactericidal levels were achieved for the Amps and AmprBLP strains, tolerance to cefixime and ceftibuten was observed. The bactericidal activity for the AmprNBLP strains was limited, with cefixime showing the highest activity of the three cephems. Penicillin-binding proteins 2, 4, and 5 revealed high affinity, with 50% inhibitory concentration levels below the MIC for all three cephems, suggesting that these are important targets of these agents in H. influenzae. We conclude that the cephems are highly active in vitro against Amps and AmprBLP strains of H. influenzae, but less so against AmprNBLP isolates.

Citing Articles

Inoculum effect of β-lactam antibiotics.

Lenhard J, Bulman Z J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019; 74(10):2825-2843.

PMID: 31170287 PMC: 6753498. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkz226.


Susceptibilities of beta-lactamase-producing and -nonproducing ampicillin-resistant strains of Haemophilus influenzae to ceftibuten, cefaclor, cefuroxime, cefixime, cefotaxime, and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid.

Barry A, Fuchs P, Pfaller M Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993; 37(1):14-8.

PMID: 8431012 PMC: 187597. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.37.1.14.


Ceftibuten pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Focus on paediatric use.

Kearns G, Young R Clin Pharmacokinet. 1994; 26(3):169-89.

PMID: 8194281 DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199426030-00002.


Comparison of agar dilution, broth dilution, and disk diffusion testing of ampicillin against Haemophilus species by using in-house and commercially prepared media.

Kohner P, Rosenblatt J, Cockerill 3rd F J Clin Microbiol. 1994; 32(6):1594-6.

PMID: 8077411 PMC: 264047. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.32.6.1594-1596.1994.


Ceftibuten. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy.

Wiseman L, Balfour J Drugs. 1994; 47(5):784-808.

PMID: 7520858 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199447050-00006.


References
1.
Kamimura T, Kojo H, Matsumoto Y, Mine Y, Goto S, Kuwahara S . In vitro and in vivo antibacterial properties of FK 027, a new orally active cephem antibiotic. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984; 25(1):98-104. PMC: 185443. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.25.1.98. View

2.
Shigi Y, Matsumoto Y, Kaizu M, Fujishita Y, Kojo H . Mechanism of action of the new orally active cephalosporin FK027. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1984; 37(7):790-6. DOI: 10.7164/antibiotics.37.790. View

3.
Mendelman P, Chaffin D, Stull T, Rubens C, Mack K, Smith A . Characterization of non-beta-lactamase-mediated ampicillin resistance in Haemophilus influenzae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984; 26(2):235-44. PMC: 284128. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.26.2.235. View

4.
Mendelman P, Chaffin D, Clausen C, Stull T, Needham C, Williams J . Failure to detect ampicillin-resistant, non-beta-lactamase-producing Haemophilus influenzae by standard disk susceptibility testing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986; 30(2):274-80. PMC: 180534. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.30.2.274. View

5.
Fuchs P, Barry A, Jones R . Cefixime disk susceptibility test criteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1986; 24(4):647-9. PMC: 268991. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.24.4.647-649.1986. View