» Articles » PMID: 26091841

Feasibility of Coronary Calcium and Stent Image Subtraction Using 320-detector Row CT Angiography

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2015 Jun 21
PMID 26091841
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The reader confidence and diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) can be compromised by the presence of calcified plaques and stents causing blooming artifacts. Compared to conventional invasive coronary angiography (ICA), this may cause an overestimation of stenosis severity leading to false-positive results. In a pilot study, we tested the feasibility of a new coronary calcium image subtraction algorithm in relation to reader confidence and diagnostic accuracy.

Methods: Forty-three patients underwent clinically indicated ICA and CCTA using a 320-detector row CT. Median Agatston score was 510. Two data sets were reconstructed: a conventional CCTA (CCTAconv) and a subtracted CCTA (CCTAsub), where calcifications detected on noncontrast images were subtracted from the CCTA. Reader confidence and concordance with ICA for identification of >50% stenosis were recorded. We defined target segments on CCTAconv as motion-free coronary segments with calcification or stent and low reader confidence. The effect of CCTAsub was assessed. No approval from the ethics committee was required according to Danish law.

Results: A total of 76 target segments were identified. The use of coronary calcium image subtraction improved the reader confidence in 66% of these segments. In target segments, specificity (86% vs 65%; P < .01) and positive predictive value (71% vs 51%, P = .03) were improved using CCTAsub compared to CCTAconv without loss in negative predictive value.

Conclusions: Our initial experience with coronary calcium image subtraction suggests that it is feasible and could lead to an improvement in reader confidence and diagnostic accuracy for identification of significant coronary artery disease.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic value of deep learning reconstruction-based subtraction CT-FFR in patients with calcified-related stenosis or stent implantation.

Xu C, Yi Y, Xu M, Zou L, Wang M, Wang Y Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025; 15(2):1599-1612.

PMID: 39995698 PMC: 11847182. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-1366.


A calcification subtraction method for postmortem coronary computed tomography angiography.

Inokuchi G, Kojima M, Chiba F, Hoshioka Y, Yoshida M, Tsuneya S Int J Legal Med. 2024; 139(1):119-130.

PMID: 39261357 PMC: 11732937. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-024-03321-0.


Diagnostic Accuracy of Subtraction Coronary CT Angiography in Severely Calcified Segments: Comparison Between Readers With Different Levels of Experience.

Li F, He Q, Xu L, Zhou Y, Sun Y, Wang Z Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:828751.

PMID: 35387432 PMC: 8977640. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.828751.


Diagnostic Improvements of Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction for Assessing Calcification-Related Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.

Yi Y, Xu C, Xu M, Yan J, Li Y, Wang J Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8:758793.

PMID: 34805313 PMC: 8595262. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.758793.


Clinical Applications of Wide-Detector CT Scanners for Cardiothoracic Imaging: An Update.

Kang E Korean J Radiol. 2019; 20(12):1583-1596.

PMID: 31854147 PMC: 6923215. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0327.


References
1.
Tanaka R, Yoshioka K, Muranaka K, Chiba T, Ueda T, Sasaki T . Improved evaluation of calcified segments on coronary CT angiography: a feasibility study of coronary calcium subtraction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 29 Suppl 2:75-81. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0316-5. View

2.
Agatston A, Janowitz W, HILDNER F, Zusmer N, VIAMONTE Jr M, Detrano R . Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990; 15(4):827-32. DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-t. View

3.
Schroeder S, Achenbach S, Bengel F, Burgstahler C, Cademartiri F, de Feyter P . Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council.... Eur Heart J. 2007; 29(4):531-56. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm544. View

4.
Mark D, Berman D, Budoff M, Carr J, Gerber T, Hecht H . ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 76(2):E1-42. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22495. View

5.
Miller J, Rochitte C, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I . Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(22):2324-36. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806576. View