Comparison Between Different Intensity Normalization Methods in 123I-Ioflupane Imaging for the Automatic Detection of Parkinsonism
Overview
Affiliations
Intensity normalization is an important pre-processing step in the study and analysis of DaTSCAN SPECT imaging. As most automatic supervised image segmentation and classification methods base their assumptions regarding the intensity distributions on a standardized intensity range, intensity normalization takes on a very significant role. In this work, a comparison between different novel intensity normalization methods is presented. These proposed methodologies are based on Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) image filtering and mean-squared error (MSE) optimization. The GMM-based image filtering method is achieved according to a probability threshold that removes the clusters whose likelihood are negligible in the non-specific regions. The MSE optimization method consists of a linear transformation that is obtained by minimizing the MSE in the non-specific region between the intensity normalized image and the template. The proposed intensity normalization methods are compared to: i) a standard approach based on the specific-to-non-specific binding ratio that is widely used, and ii) a linear approach based on the α-stable distribution. This comparison is performed on a DaTSCAN image database comprising analysis and classification stages for the development of a computer aided diagnosis (CAD) system for Parkinsonian syndrome (PS) detection. In addition, these proposed methods correct spatially varying artifacts that modulate the intensity of the images. Finally, using the leave-one-out cross-validation technique over these two approaches, the system achieves results up to a 92.91% of accuracy, 94.64% of sensitivity and 92.65 % of specificity, outperforming previous approaches based on a standard and a linear approach, which are used as a reference. The use of advanced intensity normalization techniques, such as the GMM-based image filtering and the MSE optimization improves the diagnosis of PS.
Self-normalized Classification of Parkinson's Disease DaTscan Images.
Zhou Y, Tagare H Proceedings (IEEE Int Conf Bioinformatics Biomed). 2022; 2021:1205-1212.
PMID: 35425663 PMC: 9006242. DOI: 10.1109/bibm52615.2021.9669820.
Choi B, Kang S, Kim H, Kwon O, Vu H, Youn S Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(9).
PMID: 34573899 PMC: 8467049. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11091557.
Advances in multimodal data fusion in neuroimaging: Overview, challenges, and novel orientation.
Zhang Y, Dong Z, Wang S, Yu X, Yao X, Zhou Q Inf Fusion. 2020; 64:149-187.
PMID: 32834795 PMC: 7366126. DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2020.07.006.
Parkinson's Disease Detection Using Isosurfaces-Based Features and Convolutional Neural Networks.
Ortiz A, Munilla J, Martinez-Ibanez M, Gorriz J, Ramirez J, Salas-Gonzalez D Front Neuroinform. 2019; 13:48.
PMID: 31312131 PMC: 6614282. DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2019.00048.
Llera A, Huertas I, Mir P, Beckmann C Mol Imaging Biol. 2018; 21(2):339-347.
PMID: 29987621 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-018-1217-8.