» Articles » PMID: 26019013

Multiscale Mechanobiology: Computational Models for Integrating Molecules to Multicellular Systems

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2015 May 29
PMID 26019013
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mechanical signals exist throughout the biological landscape. Across all scales, these signals, in the form of force, stiffness, and deformations, are generated and processed, resulting in an active mechanobiological circuit that controls many fundamental aspects of life, from protein unfolding and cytoskeletal remodeling to collective cell motions. The multiple scales and complex feedback involved present a challenge for fully understanding the nature of this circuit, particularly in development and disease in which it has been implicated. Computational models that accurately predict and are based on experimental data enable a means to integrate basic principles and explore fine details of mechanosensing and mechanotransduction in and across all levels of biological systems. Here we review recent advances in these models along with supporting and emerging experimental findings.

Citing Articles

Biomechanics of soft biological tissues and organs, mechanobiology, homeostasis and modelling.

Holzapfel G, Humphrey J, Ogden R J R Soc Interface. 2025; 22(222):20240361.

PMID: 39876788 PMC: 11775666. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0361.


Engineering innovations in medicine and biology: Revolutionizing patient care through mechanical solutions.

Gazo Hanna E, Younes K, Roufayel R, Khazaal M, Fajloun Z Heliyon. 2024; 10(4):e26154.

PMID: 38390063 PMC: 10882044. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26154.


MRTF may be the missing link in a multiscale mechanobiology approach toward macrophage dysfunction in space.

An R Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022; 10:997365.

PMID: 36172272 PMC: 9510870. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.997365.


Seven challenges in the multiscale modeling of multicellular tissues.

Fletcher A, Osborne J WIREs Mech Dis. 2022; 14(1):e1527.

PMID: 35023326 PMC: 11478939. DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1527.


Risky interpretations across the length scales: continuum vs. discrete models for soft tissue mechanobiology.

Stracuzzi A, Britt B, Mazza E, Ehret A Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2022; 21(2):433-454.

PMID: 34985590 PMC: 8940853. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-021-01543-4.


References
1.
Discher D, Janmey P, Wang Y . Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science. 2005; 310(5751):1139-43. DOI: 10.1126/science.1116995. View

2.
Chen C, Krishnan R, Zhou E, Ramachandran A, Tambe D, Rajendran K . Fluidization and resolidification of the human bladder smooth muscle cell in response to transient stretch. PLoS One. 2010; 5(8):e12035. PMC: 2917357. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012035. View

3.
Zhang L, Athale C, Deisboeck T . Development of a three-dimensional multiscale agent-based tumor model: simulating gene-protein interaction profiles, cell phenotypes and multicellular patterns in brain cancer. J Theor Biol. 2006; 244(1):96-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.06.034. View

4.
Wolf K, Friedl P . Extracellular matrix determinants of proteolytic and non-proteolytic cell migration. Trends Cell Biol. 2011; 21(12):736-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.09.006. View

5.
Kim M, Kim C, Wood L, Neal D, Kamm R, Asada H . Integrating focal adhesion dynamics, cytoskeleton remodeling, and actin motor activity for predicting cell migration on 3D curved surfaces of the extracellular matrix. Integr Biol (Camb). 2012; 4(11):1386-97. DOI: 10.1039/c2ib20159c. View