» Articles » PMID: 26016703

Clinicopathologic Features and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Non-cutaneous Malignant Melanoma: a Single-center Retrospective Study of 71 Cases

Overview
Journal Int J Dermatol
Specialty Dermatology
Date 2015 May 29
PMID 26016703
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This retrospective study was carried out to define the clinical features and prognostic differences in non-cutaneous malignant melanoma (non-CMM) originating from different anatomic sites.

Methods: Clinical and follow-up data for 71 patients with non-CMM were collected and reviewed.

Results: Of the 71 non-CMM patients, 59 were diagnosed with mucosal malignant melanoma (MMM) and 12 with ocular malignant melanoma (OMM). In the 59 MMM patients, the nasal cavity was the most common anatomic site (n = 31, 43.7% of all non-CMM), followed by the oral cavity (n = 9, 12.7%), the genitourinary tract (n = 9, 12.7%), the anorectum (n = 8, 11.3%), and the gastrointestinal tract (n = 2, 2.8%). In the 12 patients with OMM, anatomic sites included the choroid (n = 8, 11.3% of all non-CMM) and the conjunctiva (n = 4, 5.6%). The survival outcome of patients with OMM was much better than that of patients with MMM (P < 0.001). In MMM patients, anorectal melanoma was associated with a worse survival outcome. Age of ≥ 70 years (P < 0.001) and tumor size of > 2 cm (P = 0.02) were significantly poor prognostic factors in MMM. Age (relative risk [RR] 1.068, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.006-1.133; P = 0.03) and tumor size (RR 1.410, 95% CI 1.038-1.915; P = 0.028) were independent predictors for the postoperative survival of MMM patients. Patients with these two risk factors had a higher risk for recurrence or death (RR 3.107, 95% CI 1.627-5.595).

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that prognoses differ in patients with different anatomic sites of primary non-CMM. Advanced age and larger tumor size are the main factors affecting prognosis. Patients with poor risk factors should be treated differently to improve their survival outcome.

Citing Articles

Endoscopic ultrasound features of rectal melanoma: A case report and review of literature.

Xiong Z, Wei X, Wang L, Xia C, Li Z, Long C World J Clin Cases. 2024; 12(16):2862-2868.

PMID: 38899292 PMC: 11185328. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i16.2862.


Mucosal Malignant Melanoma of Head and Neck: A Case Series from a Single Institute and Review of Literature Abstract.

Trivedi S, Shukla S, Pandya S, Mehta J, Pandya S, Sharma M Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023; 75(4):3415-3420.

PMID: 37974828 PMC: 10646126. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-023-04001-y.


Clinicopathological and prognostic value of Ki-67 expression in oral malignant melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Moltajaei M, Pourzare Mehrbani S, Motahari P, Rezapour R J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2023; 16(3):140-146.

PMID: 36704188 PMC: 9871167. DOI: 10.34172/joddd.2022.024.


Graphene-Based Electrochemical Sensor for Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Markers.

Liang Y, Xu Y, Tong Y, Chen Y, Chen X, Wu S Front Chem. 2022; 10:883627.

PMID: 35464224 PMC: 9024117. DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.883627.


Temporal Trends in the Incidence and Mortality of Skin Malignant Melanoma in China from 1990 to 2019.

Bai R, Huang H, Li M, Chu M J Oncol. 2021; 2021:9989824.

PMID: 34475955 PMC: 8407983. DOI: 10.1155/2021/9989824.