» Articles » PMID: 26011295

Terminated Trials in the ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database: Evaluation of Availability of Primary Outcome Data and Reasons for Termination

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 May 27
PMID 26011295
Citations 98
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Clinical trials that end prematurely (or "terminate") raise financial, ethical, and scientific concerns. The extent to which the results of such trials are disseminated and the reasons for termination have not been well characterized.

Methods And Findings: A cross-sectional, descriptive study of terminated clinical trials posted on the ClinicalTrials.gov results database as of February 2013 was conducted. The main outcomes were to characterize the availability of primary outcome data on ClinicalTrials.gov and in the published literature and to identify the reasons for trial termination. Approximately 12% of trials with results posted on the ClinicalTrials.gov results database (905/7,646) were terminated. Most trials were terminated for reasons other than accumulated data from the trial (68%; 619/905), with an insufficient rate of accrual being the lead reason for termination among these trials (57%; 350/619). Of the remaining trials, 21% (193/905) were terminated based on data from the trial (findings of efficacy or toxicity) and 10% (93/905) did not specify a reason. Overall, data for a primary outcome measure were available on ClinicalTrials.gov and in the published literature for 72% (648/905) and 22% (198/905) of trials, respectively. Primary outcome data were reported on the ClinicalTrials.gov results database and in the published literature more frequently (91% and 46%, respectively) when the decision to terminate was based on data from the trial.

Conclusions: Trials terminate for a variety of reasons, not all of which reflect failures in the process or an inability to achieve the intended goals. Primary outcome data were reported most often when termination was based on data from the trial. Further research is needed to identify best practices for disseminating the experience and data resulting from terminated trials in order to help ensure maximal societal benefit from the investments of trial participants and others involved with the study.

Citing Articles

Analysis of eligibility criteria clusters based on large language models for clinical trial design.

Bornet A, Khlebnikov P, Meer F, Haas Q, Yazdani A, Zhang B J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024; 32(3):447-458.

PMID: 39724913 PMC: 11833473. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocae311.


Pulmonary and Physical Virtual Reality Exercises for Patients With Blunt Chest Trauma: Randomized Clinical Trial.

Groenveld T, Smits I, Scholten N, de Vries M, Goor H, Stirler V JMIR Serious Games. 2024; 12:e54389.

PMID: 39652866 PMC: 11667138. DOI: 10.2196/54389.


Methodological insights from the EPISTOP trial to designing clinical trials in rare diseases-A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.

Wied S, Hilgers R, Heussen N, Kotulska K, Dirani M, Kuchenbuch M PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0312936.

PMID: 39625912 PMC: 11614242. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312936.


Trial Factors Associated With Completion of Clinical Trials Evaluating AI: Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Chen D, Cao C, Kloosterman R, Parsa R, Raman S J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e58578.

PMID: 39312296 PMC: 11459098. DOI: 10.2196/58578.


Development of the Better Research Interactions for Every Family (BRIEF) intervention to support recruitment for neonatal clinical trials: an intervention mapping guided approach.

Weiss E, Gray M, Ko L, Duenas D, Oslin E, Kraft S Trials. 2024; 25(1):610.

PMID: 39267164 PMC: 11395641. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08446-6.


References
1.
Kitterman D, Cheng S, Dilts D, Orwoll E . The prevalence and economic impact of low-enrolling clinical studies at an academic medical center. Acad Med. 2011; 86(11):1360-6. PMC: 3203249. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182306440. View

2.
Korn E, Freidlin B, Mooney M, Abrams J . Accrual experience of National Cancer Institute Cooperative Group phase III trials activated from 2000 to 2007. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(35):5197-201. PMC: 3020692. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.5382. View

3.
Ross J, Tse T, Zarin D, Xu H, Zhou L, Krumholz H . Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis. BMJ. 2012; 344:d7292. PMC: 3623605. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d7292. View

4.
Kasenda B, von Elm E, You J, Blumle A, Tomonaga Y, Saccilotto R . Prevalence, characteristics, and publication of discontinued randomized trials. JAMA. 2014; 311(10):1045-51. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.1361. View

5.
McDonald A, Knight R, Campbell M, Entwistle V, Grant A, Cook J . What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2006; 7:9. PMC: 1475627. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-7-9. View