» Articles » PMID: 21366476

The ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database--update and Key Issues

Overview
Journal N Engl J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2011 Mar 4
PMID 21366476
Citations 297
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The ClinicalTrials.gov trial registry was expanded in 2008 to include a database for reporting summary results. We summarize the structure and contents of the results database, provide an update of relevant policies, and show how the data can be used to gain insight into the state of clinical research.

Methods: We analyzed ClinicalTrials.gov data that were publicly available between September 2009 and September 2010.

Results: As of September 27, 2010, ClinicalTrials.gov received approximately 330 new and 2000 revised registrations each week, along with 30 new and 80 revised results submissions. We characterized the 79,413 registry and 2178 results of trial records available as of September 2010. From a sample cohort of results records, 78 of 150 (52%) had associated publications within 2 years after posting. Of results records available publicly, 20% reported more than two primary outcome measures and 5% reported more than five. Of a sample of 100 registry record outcome measures, 61% lacked specificity in describing the metric used in the planned analysis. In a sample of 700 results records, the mean number of different analysis populations per study group was 2.5 (median, 1; range, 1 to 25). Of these trials, 24% reported results for 90% or less of their participants.

Conclusions: ClinicalTrials.gov provides access to study results not otherwise available to the public. Although the database allows examination of various aspects of ongoing and completed clinical trials, its ultimate usefulness depends on the research community to submit accurate, informative data.

Citing Articles

Protocol publication rate and comparison between article, registry and protocol in RCTs.

Mathieu S, Bouillon-Minois J, Renard Triche L, Coudeyre E, Ingrid D, Thomas F BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025; 25(1):31.

PMID: 39893396 PMC: 11786558. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-025-02471-y.


Comprehensive evaluation of pure and hybrid collaborative filtering in drug repurposing.

Reda C, Vie J, Wolkenhauer O Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2711.

PMID: 39837888 PMC: 11751339. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-85927-x.


Analysis of eligibility criteria clusters based on large language models for clinical trial design.

Bornet A, Khlebnikov P, Meer F, Haas Q, Yazdani A, Zhang B J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024; 32(3):447-458.

PMID: 39724913 PMC: 11833473. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocae311.


West Nile Virus in a changing climate: epidemiology, pathology, advances in diagnosis and treatment, vaccine designing and control strategies, emerging public health challenges - a comprehensive review.

Singh P, Khatib M, Ballal S, Kaur M, Nathiya D, Sharma S Emerg Microbes Infect. 2024; 14(1):2437244.

PMID: 39614679 PMC: 11703391. DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2024.2437244.


Facilitation of Enrollment onto Cancer Clinical Trials Using a Novel Navigator-Assisted Program: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Hossami M, Abdel-Nabi R, Zaib F, Touma K, Nassar R, Rim S Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(11):7144-7154.

PMID: 39590157 PMC: 11593092. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31110526.


References
1.
Chan A, Krleza-Jeric K, Schmid I, Altman D . Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. CMAJ. 2004; 171(7):735-40. PMC: 517858. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1041086. View

2.
Chan A . Bias, spin, and misreporting: time for full access to trial protocols and results. PLoS Med. 2008; 5(11):e230. PMC: 2586359. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050230. View

3.
Curfman G, Morrissey S, Drazen J . Expression of concern: Bombardier et al., "Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis," N Engl J Med 2000;343:1520-8. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353(26):2813-4. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe058314. View

4.
Laine C, Horton R, DeAngelis C, Drazen J, Frizelle F, Godlee F . Clinical trial registration--looking back and moving ahead. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356(26):2734-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe078110. View

5.
BEECHER H . Ethics and clinical research. N Engl J Med. 1966; 274(24):1354-60. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM196606162742405. View