» Articles » PMID: 26010322

FRAP, FLIM, and FRET: Detection and Analysis of Cellular Dynamics on a Molecular Scale Using Fluorescence Microscopy

Overview
Journal Mol Reprod Dev
Date 2015 May 27
PMID 26010322
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The combination of fluorescent-probe technology plus modern optical microscopes allows investigators to monitor dynamic events in living cells with exquisite temporal and spatial resolution. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), for example, has long been used to monitor molecular dynamics both within cells and on cellular surfaces. Although bound by the diffraction limit imposed on all optical microscopes, the combination of digital cameras and the application of fluorescence intensity information on large-pixel arrays have allowed such dynamic information to be monitored and quantified. Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM), on the other hand, utilizes the information from an ensemble of fluorophores to probe changes in the local environment. Using either fluorescence-intensity or lifetime approaches, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) microscopy provides information about molecular interactions, with Ångstrom resolution. In this review, we summarize the theoretical framework underlying these methods and illustrate their utility in addressing important problems in reproductive and developmental systems.

Citing Articles

Particle-based phasor-FLIM-FRET resolves protein-protein interactions inside single viral particles.

Coucke Q, Parveen N, Fernandez G, Qian C, Hofkens J, Debyser Z Biophys Rep (N Y). 2023; 3(3):100122.

PMID: 37649577 PMC: 10463199. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpr.2023.100122.


Single Molecule Tracking Nanoscopy Extended to Two Colors with MTT2col for the Analysis of Cell-Cell Interactions in Leukemia.

Maillot L, Irla M, Serge A Bio Protoc. 2022; 12(8):e4390.

PMID: 35800095 PMC: 9081901. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4390.


Recent Advances in Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching for Decoupling Transport and Kinetics of Biomacromolecules in Cellular Physiology.

Cai N, Lai A, Liao K, Corridon P, Graves D, Chan V Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(9).

PMID: 35567083 PMC: 9105003. DOI: 10.3390/polym14091913.


Correlative Organelle Microscopy: Fluorescence Guided Volume Electron Microscopy of Intracellular Processes.

Loginov S, Fermie J, Fokkema J, Agronskaia A, De Heus C, Blab G Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022; 10:829545.

PMID: 35478966 PMC: 9035751. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.829545.


Computational Methods for Single-Cell Imaging and Omics Data Integration.

Watson E, Fard A, Mar J Front Mol Biosci. 2022; 8:768106.

PMID: 35111809 PMC: 8801747. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.768106.


References
1.
Chang C, Mycek M . Total variation versus wavelet-based methods for image denoising in fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy. J Biophotonics. 2012; 5(5-6):449-57. PMC: 4106132. DOI: 10.1002/jbio.201100137. View

2.
Munnelly H, Roess D, Wade W, Barisas B . Interferometric fringe fluorescence photobleaching recovery interrogates entire cell surfaces. Biophys J. 1998; 75(2):1131-8. PMC: 1299787. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77602-7. View

3.
Machacek M, Hodgson L, Welch C, Elliott H, Pertz O, Nalbant P . Coordination of Rho GTPase activities during cell protrusion. Nature. 2009; 461(7260):99-103. PMC: 2885353. DOI: 10.1038/nature08242. View

4.
Meng F, Sachs F . Visualizing dynamic cytoplasmic forces with a compliance-matched FRET sensor. J Cell Sci. 2010; 124(Pt 2):261-9. PMC: 3010192. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.071928. View

5.
Axelrod D, Ravdin P, Koppel D, Schlessinger J, Webb W, Elson E . Lateral motion of fluorescently labeled acetylcholine receptors in membranes of developing muscle fibers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976; 73(12):4594-8. PMC: 431558. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.73.12.4594. View