» Articles » PMID: 26000128

Automation in Indirect Immunofluorescence Testing: a New Step in the Evolution of the Autoimmunology Laboratory

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2015 May 23
PMID 26000128
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) plays an important role in immunological and immunometric assays for detecting and measuring autoantibodies. This technology was the first multiplex method used to detect cardinal autoantibodies for the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases. Over the last 20 years, research has enabled the progressive identification of cell and tissue autoantigens which are the target of autoantibodies originally detected by IIF. Accordingly, newer immunometric methods, capable of measuring concentrations of specific autoantibodies directed against these autoantigens, allowed for a gradual replacement of the IIF method in the autoimmunology laboratory. Currently, IIF remains the method of choice only in selected fields of autoimmune diagnostics. Following the recent statement by the American College of Rheumatology that the IIF technique should be considered as the standard screening method for the detection of ANA, the biomedical industry has developed technological solutions which significantly improve automation of the procedure, not only in the preparation of substrates and slides, but also in microscope reading. This review summarizes the general and specific features of new available commercial systems (Aklides, Medipan; Nova View, Inova; Zenit G Sight, A. Menarini Diagnostics; Europattern, Euroimmun; Helios, Aesku.Diagnostics; Image Navigator, Immuno Concepts; Cytospot, Autoimmun Diagnostika) for automation of the IIF method. The expected advantages of automated IIF are the reduction in frequency of false negative and false positive results, the reduction of intra- and inter-laboratory variability, the improvement of correlation of staining patterns with corresponding autoantibody reactivities, and higher throughput in the laboratory workflow.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Estimated Endpoint Titer of NOVA View in Indirect Immunofluorescent Antinuclear Antibody Testing.

Cho H, Jeong S, Hong J, Kim D, Park Y, Jeong S Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(15).

PMID: 39125456 PMC: 11311674. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14151580.


Computer-aided classification of indirect immunofluorescence patterns on esophagus and split skin for the detection of autoimmune dermatoses.

Hocke J, Krauth J, Krause C, Gerlach S, Warnemunde N, Affeldt K Front Immunol. 2023; 14:1111172.

PMID: 36926325 PMC: 10013071. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1111172.


Standardization and Quality Assessment Under the Perspective of Automated Computer-Assisted HEp-2 Immunofluorescence Assay Systems.

Cinquanta L, Bizzaro N, Pesce G Front Immunol. 2021; 12:638863.

PMID: 33717188 PMC: 7947926. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.638863.


A Multicenter Analysis of Subjectivity of Indirect Immunofluorescence Test in Antinuclear Antibody Screening.

Turan Farasat V, Ecemis T, Dogan Y, Sener A, Ece G, Erbay Dundar P Arch Rheumatol. 2019; 34(3):326-333.

PMID: 31598599 PMC: 6768788. DOI: 10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2019.7310.


Automated Processing and Evaluation of Anti-Nuclear Antibody Indirect Immunofluorescence Testing.

Ricchiuti V, Adams J, Hardy D, Katayev A, Fleming J Front Immunol. 2018; 9:927.

PMID: 29780386 PMC: 5946161. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00927.


References
1.
Rondeel J, van Gelder W, van der Leeden H, Dinkelaar R . Different strategies in the laboratory diagnosis of autoimmune disease: immunofluorescence, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or both?. Ann Clin Biochem. 1999; 36 ( Pt 2):189-95. DOI: 10.1177/000456329903600209. View

2.
Homburger H, Cahen Y, Griffiths J, Jacob G . Detection of antinuclear antibodies: comparative evaluation of enzyme immunoassay and indirect immunofluorescence methods. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998; 122(11):993-9. View

3.
Meroni P, Schur P . ANA screening: an old test with new recommendations. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010; 69(8):1420-2. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2009.127100. View

4.
Nifli A, Notas G, Mamoulaki M, Niniraki M, Ampartzaki V, Theodoropoulos P . Comparison of a multiplex, bead-based fluorescent assay and immunofluorescence methods for the detection of ANA and ANCA autoantibodies in human serum. J Immunol Methods. 2006; 311(1-2):189-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2006.02.004. View

5.
Nairn R, Ghose T, PORTEOUS I, Urquhart J . A routine immunofluorescence method for detecting autoantibodies to thyroid colloid. J Clin Pathol. 1962; 15:594-5. PMC: 480467. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.15.6.594. View