» Articles » PMID: 25995746

Does Joint Line Elevation After Revision Knee Arthroplasty Affect Tibio-femoral Kinematics, Contact Pressure or Collateral Ligament Lengths? An in Vitro Analysis

Overview
Journal Arch Med Sci
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2015 May 22
PMID 25995746
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Correct restoration of the joint line is generally considered as crucial when performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). During revision knee arthroplasty however, elevation of the joint line occurs frequently. The general belief is that this negatively affects the clinical outcome, but the reasons are still not well understood.

Material And Methods: In this cadaveric in vitro study the biomechanical consequences of joint line elevation were investigated using a previously validated cadaver model simulating active deep knee squats and passive flexion-extension cycles. Knee specimens were sequentially tested after total knee arthroplasty with joint line restoration and after 4 mm joint line elevation.

Results: The tibia rotated internally with increasing knee flexion during both passive and squatting motion (range: 17° and 7° respectively). Joint line elevation of 4 mm did not make a statistically significant difference. During passive motion, the tibia tended to become slightly more adducted with increasing knee flexion (range: 2°), while it went into slighlty less adduction during squatting (range: -2°). Neither of both trends was influenced by joint line elevation. Also anteroposterior translation of the femoral condyle centres was not affected by joint line elevation, although there was a tendency for a small posterior shift (of about 3 mm) during squatting after joint line elevation. In terms of kinetics, ligaments lengths and length changes, tibiofemoral contact pressures and quadriceps forces all showed the same patterns before and joint line elevation. No statistically significant changes could be detected.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that joint line elevation by 4 mm in revision total knee arthroplasty does not cause significant kinematic and kinetic differences during passive flexion/extension movement and squatting in the tibio-femoral joint, nor does it affect the elongation patterns of collateral ligaments. Therefore, clinical problems after joint line elevation are probably situated in the patello-femoral joint or caused by joint line elevation of more than 4 mm.

Citing Articles

Influence of Mechanical Deformity on Joint Line Reconstruction.

Jungwirth-Weinberger A, Kasparek M, Pattabiraman K, Sain A, Muellner M, Scheidl T J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004796 PMC: 11856970. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041264.


An MRI-Derived Formula for Estimating the Native Joint Line Position in the Presence of Distal Femoral Bone Loss.

Rao R, Lim A, Ho J, Ong L, Kamaruddin F Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73707.

PMID: 39677165 PMC: 11646141. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73707.


[Effect of prosthetic joint line installation height errors on insert wear in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Xiong S, Qu Y, Ren J, Zhang J, Li H, Chen Z Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2023; 40(6):1192-1199.

PMID: 38151943 PMC: 10753317. DOI: 10.7507/1001-5515.202307051.


Identification of the joint line in revision total knee arthroplasty using a multiple linear regression model: a cadaveric study.

Hou Y, Jiang J, Liu H, Wang R, Wu J, Wang Y Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023; 143(8):5239-5248.

PMID: 36971801 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04792-3.


Joint line reestablishment in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Akca M, Akalin Y, Cevik N, Sahin I, Avci O, Ozturk A Arthroplasty. 2022; 2(1):27.

PMID: 35236461 PMC: 8796396. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-020-00046-4.


References
1.
Bellemans J . Restoring the joint line in revision TKA: does it matter?. Knee. 2004; 11(1):3-5. DOI: 10.1016/S0968-0160(03)00099-1. View

2.
Kuster M, Bitschnau B, Votruba T . Influence of collateral ligament laxity on patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparative bilateral study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004; 124(6):415-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-004-0700-7. View

3.
Ritter M, Montgomery T, Zhou H, Keating M, Faris P, Meding J . The clinical significance of proximal tibial resection level in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (360):174-81. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199903000-00021. View

4.
Victor J, Labey L, Wong P, Innocenti B, Bellemans J . The influence of muscle load on tibiofemoral knee kinematics. J Orthop Res. 2009; 28(4):419-28. DOI: 10.1002/jor.21019. View

5.
Figgie 3rd H, Goldberg V, HEIPLE K, Moller 3rd H, Gordon N . The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986; 68(7):1035-40. View