» Articles » PMID: 25995354

Speed-accuracy Tradeoff by a Control Signal with Balanced Excitation and Inhibition

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2015 May 22
PMID 25995354
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A hallmark of flexible behavior is the brain's ability to dynamically adjust speed and accuracy in decision-making. Recent studies suggested that such adjustments modulate not only the decision threshold, but also the rate of evidence accumulation. However, the underlying neuronal-level mechanism of the rate change remains unclear. In this work, using a spiking neural network model of perceptual decision, we demonstrate that speed and accuracy of a decision process can be effectively adjusted by manipulating a top-down control signal with balanced excitation and inhibition [balanced synaptic input (BSI)]. Our model predicts that emphasizing accuracy over speed leads to reduced rate of ramping activity and reduced baseline activity of decision neurons, which have been observed recently at the level of single neurons recorded from behaving monkeys in speed-accuracy tradeoff tasks. Moreover, we found that an increased inhibitory component of BSI skews the decision time distribution and produces a pronounced exponential tail, which is commonly observed in human studies. Our findings suggest that BSI can serve as a top-down control mechanism to rapidly and parametrically trade between speed and accuracy, and such a cognitive control signal presents both when the subjects emphasize accuracy or speed in perceptual decisions.

Citing Articles

Post-error slowing during motor sequence learning under extrinsic and intrinsic error feedback conditions.

Ali H, Chatburn A, Immink M Psychol Res. 2024; 89(1):1.

PMID: 39520578 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-024-02037-5.


Rhythmic circuit function is more robust to changes in synaptic than intrinsic conductances.

Fournier Z, Alonso L, Marder E bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39282429 PMC: 11398330. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.03.611139.


Neural mechanisms for executive control of speed-accuracy trade-off.

Reppert T, Heitz R, Schall J Cell Rep. 2023; 42(11):113422.

PMID: 37950871 PMC: 10833473. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113422.


Flexible control of representational dynamics in a disinhibition-based model of decision-making.

Shen B, Louie K, Glimcher P Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 37261426 PMC: 10313320. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.82426.


Relating a Spiking Neural Network Model and the Diffusion Model of Decision-Making.

Umakantha A, Purcell B, Palmeri T Comput Brain Behav. 2022; 5(3):279-301.

PMID: 36408474 PMC: 9673774. DOI: 10.1007/s42113-022-00143-4.


References
1.
Rae B, Heathcote A, Donkin C, Averell L, Brown S . The hare and the tortoise: emphasizing speed can change the evidence used to make decisions. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014; 40(5):1226-43. DOI: 10.1037/a0036801. View

2.
Niwa M, Ditterich J . Perceptual decisions between multiple directions of visual motion. J Neurosci. 2008; 28(17):4435-45. PMC: 6670944. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5564-07.2008. View

3.
Lo C, Wang X . Cortico-basal ganglia circuit mechanism for a decision threshold in reaction time tasks. Nat Neurosci. 2006; 9(7):956-63. DOI: 10.1038/nn1722. View

4.
Eckhoff P, Wong-Lin K, Holmes P . Dimension Reduction and Dynamics of a Spiking Neural Network Model for Decision Making under Neuromodulation(). SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst. 2012; 10(1):148-188. PMC: 3388156. DOI: 10.1137/090770096. View

5.
Shadlen M, Newsome W . Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol. 2001; 86(4):1916-36. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.4.1916. View