Perceptual Decisions Between Multiple Directions of Visual Motion

Overview

Journal J Neurosci

Specialty Neurology

Date 2008 Apr 25

PMID 18434522

Citations 56

Authors

Mamiko Niwa

Jochen Ditterich

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Previous studies and models of perceptual decision making have largely focused on binary choices. However, we often have to choose from multiple alternatives. To study the neural mechanisms underlying multialternative decision making, we have asked human subjects to make perceptual decisions between multiple possible directions of visual motion. Using a multicomponent version of the random-dot stimulus, we were able to control experimentally how much sensory evidence we wanted to provide for each of the possible alternatives. We demonstrate that this task provides a rich quantitative dataset for multialternative decision making, spanning a wide range of accuracy levels and mean response times. We further present a computational model that can explain the structure of our behavioral dataset. It is based on the idea of a race between multiple integrators to a decision threshold. Each of these integrators accumulates net sensory evidence for a particular choice, provided by linear combinations of the activities of decision-relevant pools of sensory neurons.

Citing Articles

The interplay of uncertainty, relevance and learning influences auditory categorization.

Sheth J, Collina J, Piasini E, Kording K, Cohen Y, Geffen M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3348.

PMID: 39870756 PMC: 11772889. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86856-5.

A spatially continuous diffusion model of visual working memory.

Fennell A, Ratcliff R Cogn Psychol. 2023; 145:101595.

PMID: 37659278 PMC: 10546276. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101595.

As within, so without, as above, so below: Common mechanisms can support between- and within-trial category learning dynamics.

Weichart E, Galdo M, Sloutsky V, Turner B Psychol Rev. 2022; 129(5):1104-1143.

PMID: 35849355 PMC: 10321570. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000381.

Robust parallel decision-making in neural circuits with nonlinear inhibition.

Kriener B, Chaudhuri R, Fiete I Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(41):25505-25516.

PMID: 33008882 PMC: 7568288. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1917551117.

Examining aging and numerosity using an integrated diffusion model.

Ratcliff R, McKoon G J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020; 46(11):2128-2152.

PMID: 32730057 PMC: 8054446. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000937.

References

Bogacz R, Gurney K . The basal ganglia and cortex implement optimal decision making between alternative actions. Neural Comput. 2007; 19(2):442-77. DOI: 10.1162/neco.2007.19.2.442. View

Wilimzig C, Schneider S, Schoner G . The time course of saccadic decision making: dynamic field theory. Neural Netw. 2006; 19(8):1059-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.03.003. View

Bogacz R, Usher M, Zhang J, McClelland J . Extending a biologically inspired model of choice: multi-alternatives, nonlinearity and value-based multidimensional choice. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007; 362(1485):1655-70. PMC: 2440778. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2059. View

Roe R, Busemeyer J, Townsend J . Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making. Psychol Rev. 2001; 108(2):370-92. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.2.370. View

Zohary E, Shadlen M, Newsome W . Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance. Nature. 1994; 370(6485):140-3. DOI: 10.1038/370140a0. View

Shadlen M, Newsome W . Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol. 2001; 86(4):1916-36. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.4.1916. View

Roitman J, Shadlen M . Response of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area during a combined visual discrimination reaction time task. J Neurosci. 2002; 22(21):9475-89. PMC: 6758024. View

Britten K, Shadlen M, Newsome W, Movshon J . Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals. Vis Neurosci. 1993; 10(6):1157-69. DOI: 10.1017/s0952523800010269. View

Ditterich J . Evidence for time-variant decision making. Eur J Neurosci. 2007; 24(12):3628-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05221.x. View

10.

Albright T . Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. J Neurophysiol. 1984; 52(6):1106-30. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1984.52.6.1106. View

11.

Simoncelli E, Heeger D . A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT. Vision Res. 1998; 38(5):743-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00183-1. View

12.

Brainard D . The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis. 1997; 10(4):433-6. View

13.

Usher M, McClelland J . The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychol Rev. 2001; 108(3):550-92. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.550. View

14.

Heekeren H, Marrett S, Ruff D, Bandettini P, Ungerleider L . Involvement of human left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in perceptual decision making is independent of response modality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(26):10023-8. PMC: 1479865. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0603949103. View

15.

Treue S, Hol K, Rauber H . Seeing multiple directions of motion-physiology and psychophysics. Nat Neurosci. 2000; 3(3):270-6. DOI: 10.1038/72985. View

16.

Snowden R, Treue S, Andersen R . The response of neurons in areas V1 and MT of the alert rhesus monkey to moving random dot patterns. Exp Brain Res. 1992; 88(2):389-400. DOI: 10.1007/BF02259114. View

17.

Bogacz R, Brown E, Moehlis J, Holmes P, Cohen J . The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. Psychol Rev. 2006; 113(4):700-65. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.700. View

18.

Pelli D . The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis. 1997; 10(4):437-42. View

19.

Palmer J, Huk A, Shadlen M . The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. J Vis. 2005; 5(5):376-404. DOI: 10.1167/5.5.1. View

20.

Ratcliff R, Smith P . A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychol Rev. 2004; 111(2):333-67. PMC: 1440925. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.333. View