» Articles » PMID: 2599035

Differential Effects of Retinal Target Displacement, Changing Size and Changing Disparity in the Control of Anterior/posterior and Lateral Body Sway

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 1989 Jan 1
PMID 2599035
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When visual information is provided in addition to input from other sensory systems, normal body sway can be attenuated by about 50%. The essential visual cue is retinal target displacement, which increases as eye-target distance is reduced. As a result, both lateral and anterior/posterior (A-P) sway decrease as eye/target distance decreases. We have investigated the geometrical basis of lateral and fore-aft sway detection by vision, the latter provided by detection of change in disparity of the visual axis of both eyes and change in target size. Using known movement detection thresholds the largest possible distance for visual stabilization of posture can be calculated to be 34 m for lateral sway, and for fore-aft sway 1.50 m for change in disparity and 3.20 m for change in size. Visual stimuli were designed to selectively stabilize fore-aft sway either by change in size or by change in disparity. The experiments revealed that the theoretical prediction overestimates the efficacy of visual stabilization of lateral sway and underestimates the efficacy of fore-aft sway stabilization. It is proposed that microoscillations of the eye increase the threshold for detection of retinal target displacements, leading to less efficient lateral sway stabilization than expected, and that the threshold for detection of self motion in the A-P direction is lower than the threshold for object motion detection used in the calculations, leading to more efficient stabilization of A-P sway.

Citing Articles

Touch may reduce cognitive load during assisted typing by individuals with developmental disabilities.

Nicoli G, Pavon G, Grayson A, Emerson A, Mitra S Front Integr Neurosci. 2023; 17:1181025.

PMID: 37600233 PMC: 10434793. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2023.1181025.


Perception of Emotion and Postural Stability Control at Different Distances.

Chikh S, Charrada S, Watelain E J Eye Mov Res. 2023; 15(4).

PMID: 37346280 PMC: 10281002. DOI: 10.16910/jemr.15.4.6.


Interaction between Feet and Gaze in Postural Control.

Bucci M, Villeneuve P Brain Sci. 2022; 12(11).

PMID: 36358385 PMC: 9688685. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12111459.


Visual Predictors of Postural Sway in Older Adults.

Wood J, Killingly C, Elliott D, Anstey K, Black A Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022; 11(8):24.

PMID: 36006028 PMC: 9424966. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.8.24.


Saccadic Eye Movements Attenuate Postural Sway but Less in Sleep-Deprived Young Adults.

Vargas I, Bicalho L, Rodrigues S, Barela J Front Sports Act Living. 2020; 2:97.

PMID: 33345087 PMC: 7739768. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2020.00097.


References
1.
EDWARDS A . Body sway and vision. J Exp Psychol. 2010; 36(6):526-35. DOI: 10.1037/h0059909. View

2.
Paulus W, Straube A, Brandt T . Visual stabilization of posture. Physiological stimulus characteristics and clinical aspects. Brain. 1984; 107 ( Pt 4):1143-63. DOI: 10.1093/brain/107.4.1143. View

3.
Hlavacka F, LITVINENKOVA V . First derivative of the stabilogram and posture control in visual feed-back conditions in man. Agressologie. 1973; 14(Spec No C):45-9. View

4.
Barbur J . Speed discrimination and its relation to involuntary eye movements in human vision. Neurosci Lett. 1985; 54(1):7-12. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(85)80110-5. View

5.
Scobey R, Johnson C . Displacement thresholds for unidirectional and oscillatory movement. Vision Res. 1981; 21(8):1297-302. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(81)90234-0. View