» Articles » PMID: 36006028

Visual Predictors of Postural Sway in Older Adults

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Accurate perception of body position relative to the environment through visual cues provides sensory input to the control of postural stability. This study explored which vision measures are most important for control of postural sway in older adults with a range of visual characteristics.

Methods: Participants included 421 older adults (mean age = 72.6 ± 6.1), 220 with vision impairment associated with a range of eye diseases and 201 with normal vision. Participants completed a series of vision, cognitive, and physical function tests. Postural sway was measured using an electronic forceplate (HUR Labs) on a foam surface with eyes open. Linear regression analysis identified the strongest visual predictors of postural sway, controlling for potential confounding factors, including cognitive and physical function.

Results: In univariate regression models, unadjusted and adjusted for age, all of the vision tests were significantly associated with postural sway (P < 0.05), with the strongest predictor being visual motion sensitivity (standardized regression coefficient, β = 0.340; age-adjusted β = 0.253). In multiple regression models, motion sensitivity (β = 0.187), integrated binocular visual fields (β = -0.109), and age (β = 0.234) were the only significant visual predictors of sway, adjusted for confounding factors, explaining 23% of the variance in postural sway.

Conclusions: Of the vision tests, visual motion perception and binocular visual fields were most strongly associated with postural stability in older adults with and without vision impairment.

Translational Relevance: Findings provide insight into the visual contributions to postural stability in older adults and have implications for falls risk assessment.

Citing Articles

Dominance of attentional focus: a comparative study on its impact on standing postural control in healthy younger and older adults.

Sawai S, Murata S, Sakano Y, Fujikawa S, Yamamoto R, Shizuka Y Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1384305.

PMID: 38988825 PMC: 11233467. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1384305.


Contributions of cerebral white matter hyperintensities, age, and pedal perception to postural sway in people with HIV.

Sullivan E, Zahr N, Zhao Q, Pohl K, Sassoon S, Pfefferbaum A AIDS. 2024; 38(8):1153-1162.

PMID: 38537080 PMC: 11141235. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003894.


Kinematic characteristics of gait with different myopia: a cross-sectional study.

Xue A, Zeng Z, Wang H, Han J, Pang B Front Public Health. 2024; 11:1256242.

PMID: 38179553 PMC: 10765516. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1256242.


Physical activity and sport practice to improve balance control of visually impaired individuals: a narrative review with future perspectives.

Carretti G, Manetti M, Marini M Front Sports Act Living. 2023; 5:1260942.

PMID: 37780118 PMC: 10534048. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1260942.

References
1.
Kubicki A . Functional assessment in older adults: should we use timed up and go or gait speed test?. Neurosci Lett. 2014; 577:89-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.06.014. View

2.
Gosselin G, Fagan M . Foam pads properties and their effects on posturography in participants of different weight. Chiropr Man Therap. 2015; 23(1):2. PMC: 4308009. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-014-0045-4. View

3.
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S . The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991; 39(2):142-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x. View

4.
Wood J, Anstey K, Kerr G, Lacherez P, Lord S . A multidomain approach for predicting older driver safety under in-traffic road conditions. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008; 56(6):986-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01709.x. View

5.
Elliott D, Patla A, Flanagan J, Spaulding S, Rietdyk S, Strong G . The Waterloo Vision and Mobility Study: postural control strategies in subjects with ARM. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995; 15(6):553-9. View