Development and Characterization of Novel 8-plex DiLeu Isobaric Labels for Quantitative Proteomics and Peptidomics
Overview
Affiliations
Rationale: Relative quantification of proteins via their enzymatically digested peptide products determines disease biomarker candidate lists in discovery studies. Isobaric label-based strategies using TMT and iTRAQ allow for up to 10 samples to be multiplexed in one experiment, but their expense limits their use. The demand for cost-effective tagging reagents capable of multiplexing many samples led us to develop an 8-plex version of our isobaric labeling reagent, DiLeu.
Methods: The original 4-plex DiLeu reagent was extended to an 8-plex set by coupling isotopic variants of dimethylated leucine to an alanine balance group designed to offset the increasing mass of the label's reporter group. Tryptic peptides from a single protein digest, a protein mixture digest, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae lysate digest were labeled with 8-plex DiLeu and analyzed via nanospray liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (nanoLC/MS(2) ) on a Q-Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Characteristics of 8-plex DiLeu-labeled peptides, including quantitative accuracy and fragmentation, were examined.
Results: An 8-plex set of DiLeu reagents with 1 Da spaced reporters was synthesized at a yield of 36%. The average cost to label eight 100 µg peptide samples was calculated to be approximately $15. Normalized collision energy tests on the Q-Exactive revealed that a higher-energy collisional dissociation value of 27 generated the optimum number of high-quality spectral matches. Relative quantification of DiLeu-labeled peptides yielded normalized median ratios accurate to within 12% of their expected values.
Conclusions: Cost-effective 8-plex DiLeu reagents can be synthesized and applied to relative peptide and protein quantification. These labels increase the multiplexing capacity of our previous 4-plex implementation without requiring high-resolution instrumentation to resolve reporter ion signals.
A Tutorial Review of Labeling Methods in Mass Spectrometry-Based Quantitative Proteomics.
Wang Z, Liu P, Li L ACS Meas Sci Au. 2024; 4(4):315-337.
PMID: 39184361 PMC: 11342459. DOI: 10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.4c00007.
Quantitative Peptidomics: General Considerations.
Fricker L Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2758:89-108.
PMID: 38549010 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3646-6_5.
Recent advances in isobaric labeling and applications in quantitative proteomics.
Sivanich M, Gu T, Tabang D, Li L Proteomics. 2022; 22(19-20):e2100256.
PMID: 35687565 PMC: 9787039. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.202100256.
Recent advances in mass spectrometry analysis of neuropeptides.
Phetsanthad A, Vu N, Yu Q, Buchberger A, Chen Z, Keller C Mass Spectrom Rev. 2021; 42(2):706-750.
PMID: 34558119 PMC: 9067165. DOI: 10.1002/mas.21734.
Miles H, Delafield D, Li L RSC Chem Biol. 2021; 4:1050-1072.
PMID: 34430874 PMC: 8341969. DOI: 10.1039/d1cb00039j.