Neurocognitive Poetics: Methods and Models for Investigating the Neuronal and Cognitive-affective Bases of Literature Reception

Overview

Journal Front Hum Neurosci

Specialty Neurology

Date 2015 May 2

PMID 25932010

Citations 63

Authors

Arthur M Jacobs

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

A long tradition of research including classical rhetoric, esthetics and poetics theory, formalism and structuralism, as well as current perspectives in (neuro)cognitive poetics has investigated structural and functional aspects of literature reception. Despite a wealth of literature published in specialized journals like Poetics, however, still little is known about how the brain processes and creates literary and poetic texts. Still, such stimulus material might be suited better than other genres for demonstrating the complexities with which our brain constructs the world in and around us, because it unifies thought and language, music and imagery in a clear, manageable way, most often with play, pleasure, and emotion (Schrott and Jacobs, 2011). In this paper, I discuss methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literary reading together with pertinent results from studies on poetics, text processing, emotion, or neuroaesthetics, and outline current challenges and future perspectives.

Citing Articles

Dance and the Embodied Social Cognition of Mating: Carlos Saura's Tango in the Perspective of the Tie-Up Theory.

Lucchi Basili L, Sacco P Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2025; 59(1):31.

PMID: 39964575 PMC: 11836156. DOI: 10.1007/s12124-025-09895-7.

Predicting subjective ratings of affect and comprehensibility with text features: a reader response study of narrative poetry.

Tilmatine M, Ludtke J, Jacobs A Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1431764.

PMID: 39439760 PMC: 11494826. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1431764.

Reading Russian poetry: An expert-novice study.

Fokin D, Blohm S, Riekhakaynen E J Eye Mov Res. 2024; 13(3).

PMID: 38895042 PMC: 11185421. DOI: 10.16910/jemr.13.3.7.

The role of the target language culture on Arabic learners' fondness for Arabic poetry.

Gao L, Wang K, Yang Q, Lu Y Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1310343.

PMID: 38756491 PMC: 11098280. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1310343.

Is badfiction processed differently by the human brain? An electrophysical study on reading experience.

Weitin T, Fabian T, Glawion A, Brottrager J, Pilz Z Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 17:1333965.

PMID: 38343727 PMC: 10853416. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1333965.

References

Hofmann M, Dambacher M, Jacobs A, Kliegl R, Radach R, Kuchinke L . Occipital and orbitofrontal hemodynamics during naturally paced reading: an fNIRS study. Neuroimage. 2014; 94:193-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.014. View

Dimigen O, Sommer W, Hohlfeld A, Jacobs A, Kliegl R . Coregistration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: analyses and review. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011; 140(4):552-72. DOI: 10.1037/a0023885. View

Whissell C . Phonosymbolism and the emotional nature of sounds: evidence of the preferential use of particular phonemes in texts of differing emotional tone. Percept Mot Skills. 1999; 89(1):19-48. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1999.89.1.19. View

Joffily M, Coricelli G . Emotional valence and the free-energy principle. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013; 9(6):e1003094. PMC: 3681730. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003094. View

Wallentin M, Nielsen A, Vuust P, Dohn A, Roepstorff A, Lund T . Amygdala and heart rate variability responses from listening to emotionally intense parts of a story. Neuroimage. 2011; 58(3):963-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.077. View

Vo M, Jacobs A, Conrad M . Cross-validating the Berlin Affective Word List. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 38(4):606-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193892. View

Chatterjee A, Vartanian O . Neuroaesthetics. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014; 18(7):370-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.003. View

Hofmann M, Jacobs A . Interactive activation and competition models and semantic context: From behavioral to brain data. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014; 46 Pt 1:85-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.06.011. View

Hutzler F, Braun M, Vo M, Engl V, Hofmann M, Dambacher M . Welcome to the real world: validating fixation-related brain potentials for ecologically valid settings. Brain Res. 2007; 1172:124-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.07.025. View

10.

Rapp A, Mutschler D, Erb M . Where in the brain is nonliteral language? A coordinate-based meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Neuroimage. 2012; 63(1):600-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.022. View

11.

Wallot S, Hollis G, van Rooij M . Connected text reading and differences in text reading fluency in adult readers. PLoS One. 2013; 8(8):e71914. PMC: 3748108. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071914. View

12.

Jung-Beeman M . Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9(11):512-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.09.009. View

13.

Ferstl E, Neumann J, Bogler C, von Cramon D . The extended language network: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Hum Brain Mapp. 2007; 29(5):581-93. PMC: 2878642. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20422. View

14.

Whissell C . Readers' opinions of romantic poetry are consistent with emotional measures based on the Dictionary of Affect in Language. Percept Mot Skills. 2003; 96(3 Pt 1):990-2. DOI: 10.2466/pms.2003.96.3.990. View

15.

Just M, Carpenter P . A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. Psychol Rev. 1980; 87(4):329-54. View

16.

Aziz-Zadeh L, Wilson S, Rizzolatti G, Iacoboni M . Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions. Curr Biol. 2006; 16(18):1818-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.060. View

17.

Bower G . Mood and memory. Am Psychol. 1981; 36(2):129-48. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.36.2.129. View

18.

Aryani A, Jacobs A, Conrad M . Extracting salient sublexical units from written texts: "Emophon," a corpus-based approach to phonological iconicity. Front Psychol. 2013; 4:654. PMC: 3787248. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00654. View

19.

Kintsch W . Metaphor comprehension: a computational theory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2000; 7(2):257-66. DOI: 10.3758/bf03212981. View

20.

Gallese V, Lakoff G . The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010; 22(3):455-79. DOI: 10.1080/02643290442000310. View