» Articles » PMID: 23977177

Connected Text Reading and Differences in Text Reading Fluency in Adult Readers

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Aug 27
PMID 23977177
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The process of connected text reading has received very little attention in contemporary cognitive psychology. This lack of attention is in parts due to a research tradition that emphasizes the role of basic lexical constituents, which can be studied in isolated words or sentences. However, this lack of attention is in parts also due to the lack of statistical analysis techniques, which accommodate interdependent time series. In this study, we investigate text reading performance with traditional and nonlinear analysis techniques and show how outcomes from multiple analyses can used to create a more detailed picture of the process of text reading. Specifically, we investigate reading performance of groups of literate adult readers that differ in reading fluency during a self-paced text reading task. Our results indicate that classical metrics of reading (such as word frequency) do not capture text reading very well, and that classical measures of reading fluency (such as average reading time) distinguish relatively poorly between participant groups. Nonlinear analyses of distribution tails and reading time fluctuations provide more fine-grained information about the reading process and reading fluency.

Citing Articles

Reading Russian poetry: An expert-novice study.

Fokin D, Blohm S, Riekhakaynen E J Eye Mov Res. 2024; 13(3).

PMID: 38895042 PMC: 11185421. DOI: 10.16910/jemr.13.3.7.


Will you read how I will read? Naturalistic fMRI predictors of emergent reading.

Wat E, Jangraw D, Finn E, Bandettini P, Preston J, Landi N Neuropsychologia. 2023; 193:108763.

PMID: 38141965 PMC: 11370251. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108763.


Using measures of reading time regularity (RTR) to quantify eye movement dynamics, and how they are shaped by linguistic information.

Tschense M, Wallot S J Vis. 2022; 22(6):9.

PMID: 35612847 PMC: 9165877. DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.6.9.


Early Warning Signals in Phase Space: Geometric Resilience Loss Indicators From Multiplex Cumulative Recurrence Networks.

Hasselman F Front Physiol. 2022; 13:859127.

PMID: 35600293 PMC: 9114511. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.859127.


Fractality and Variability in Canonical and Non-Canonical English Fiction and in Non-Fictional Texts.

Mohseni M, Gast V, Redies C Front Psychol. 2021; 12:599063.

PMID: 33868078 PMC: 8044424. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.599063.


References
1.
Kennedy A, Pynte J . Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading. Vision Res. 2004; 45(2):153-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.037. View

2.
Just M, Carpenter P . A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. Psychol Rev. 1980; 87(4):329-54. View

3.
Newell K, Liu Y, Mayer-Kress G . Time scales in motor learning and development. Psychol Rev. 2001; 108(1):57-82. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.57. View

4.
Schmit J, Regis D, Riley M . Dynamic patterns of postural sway in ballet dancers and track athletes. Exp Brain Res. 2005; 163(3):370-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2185-6. View

5.
Webber Jr C, Zbilut J . Dynamical assessment of physiological systems and states using recurrence plot strategies. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1994; 76(2):965-73. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1994.76.2.965. View