» Articles » PMID: 25924934

Comparison of the Upper Airway Dynamics of Oronasal and Nasal Masks with Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Using Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Overview
Journal Sleep Breath
Publisher Springer
Date 2015 May 1
PMID 25924934
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: It is known that oronasal masks are not as effective at opening the upper airway compared to nasal only continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) masks in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. However, the physiological mechanism for this difference in efficacy is not known; although, it has been hypothesized to involve the retroglossal and/or retropalatal region of the upper airway. The objective of this study was to investigate differences in retroglossal and retropalatal anterior-posterior space with the use of oronasal vs. nasal CPAP masks using real-time cine magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI).

Methods: Ten subjects (eight men, two women) with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) were given cMRI with both nasal and oronasal CPAP masks. Each subject was imaged with each interface at pressures of 5, 10, and 15 cm of H2O, while in the supine position along the sagittal plane.

Results: The oronasal mask produced significantly less airway opening in the retropalatal region of the upper airway compared to the nasal mask interface. During exhalation, mask style had a significant effect on anterior-posterior distance p = 0.016. No differences were found in the retroglossal region between mask styles.

Conclusions: Our study confirmed previous findings showing differences in treatment efficacy between oronasal and nasal mask styles. We have shown anatomic evidence that the nasal mask is more effective in opening the upper airway compared to the oronasal mask in the retropalatal region.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Complex Upper Airway Obstruction in Children Using Cine-MRI: A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review.

Al-Naimi A, Hamad S, Shabani A, Abu-Hasan M Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e65025.

PMID: 39165475 PMC: 11334095. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65025.


Anatomical Basis of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea: A Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

B H S, G D, Sawal A, Balwir T Cureus. 2023; 15(9):e44525.

PMID: 37789996 PMC: 10544646. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44525.


What Circuits, Masks and Filters Should Be Used in Home Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.

Lujan M, Florez P, Pomares X J Clin Med. 2023; 12(7).

PMID: 37048774 PMC: 10094856. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12072692.


In search of a better CPAP interface: A network meta-analysis comparing nasal masks, nasal pillows and oronasal masks.

Chen L, Chen Y, Hu S, Lin M, Lee P, Chiang A J Sleep Res. 2022; 31(6):e13686.

PMID: 35821391 PMC: 9787466. DOI: 10.1111/jsr.13686.


Airflow dynamics in obese minipigs with obstructive sleep apnea.

Liu Z, Do T, Fong H Heliyon. 2021; 7(1):e05700.

PMID: 33521340 PMC: 7820480. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05700.


References
1.
Smith P, Wise R, Gold A, Schwartz A, PERMUTT S . Upper airway pressure-flow relationships in obstructive sleep apnea. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1988; 64(2):789-95. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1988.64.2.789. View

2.
Kushida C, Littner M, Hirshkowitz M, Morgenthaler T, Alessi C, Bailey D . Practice parameters for the use of continuous and bilevel positive airway pressure devices to treat adult patients with sleep-related breathing disorders. Sleep. 2006; 29(3):375-80. DOI: 10.1093/sleep/29.3.375. View

3.
Javaheri S, Parker T, Liming J, Corbett W, Nishiyama H, Wexler L . Sleep apnea in 81 ambulatory male patients with stable heart failure. Types and their prevalences, consequences, and presentations. Circulation. 1998; 97(21):2154-9. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.97.21.2154. View

4.
Kushida C, Nichols D, Holmes T, Quan S, Walsh J, Gottlieb D . Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on neurocognitive function in obstructive sleep apnea patients: The Apnea Positive Pressure Long-term Efficacy Study (APPLES). Sleep. 2012; 35(12):1593-602. PMC: 3490352. DOI: 10.5665/sleep.2226. View

5.
Jenkinson C, Davies R, Mullins R, Stradling J . Comparison of therapeutic and subtherapeutic nasal continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomised prospective parallel trial. Lancet. 1999; 353(9170):2100-5. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)10532-9. View