» Articles » PMID: 25904998

Evolutionary Reconstruction of Pattern Formation in 98 Dictyostelium Species Reveals That Cell-type Specialization by Lateral Inhibition is a Derived Trait

Overview
Journal Evodevo
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2015 Apr 24
PMID 25904998
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Multicellularity provides organisms with opportunities for cell-type specialization, but requires novel mechanisms to position correct proportions of different cell types throughout the organism. Dictyostelid social amoebas display an early form of multicellularity, where amoebas aggregate to form fruiting bodies, which contain only spores or up to four additional cell-types. These cell types will form the stalk and support structures for the stalk and spore head. Phylogenetic inference subdivides Dictyostelia into four major groups, with the model organism D. discoideum residing in group 4. In D. discoideum differentiation of its five cell types is dominated by lateral inhibition-type mechanisms that trigger scattered cell differentiation, with tissue patterns being formed by cell sorting.

Results: To reconstruct the evolution of pattern formation in Dictyostelia, we used cell-type specific antibodies and promoter-reporter fusion constructs to investigate pattern formation in 98 species that represent all groupings. Our results indicate that in all early diverging Dictyostelia and most members of groups 1-3, cells differentiate into maximally two cell types, prestalk and prespore cells, with pattern formation being dominated by position-dependent transdifferentiation of prespore cells into prestalk cells. In clade 2A, prestalk and stalk cell differentiation are lost and the prespore cells construct an acellular stalk. Group 4 species set aside correct proportions of prestalk and prespore cells early in development, and differentiate into up to three more supporting cell types.

Conclusions: Our experiments show that positional transdifferentiation is the ancestral mode of pattern formation in Dictyostelia. The early specification of a prestalk population equal to the number of stalk cells is a derived trait that emerged in group 4 and a few late diverging species in the other groups. Group 4 spore masses are larger than those of other groups and the differentiation of supporting cell types by lateral inhibition may have facilitated this increase in size. The signal DIF-1, which is secreted by prespore cells, triggers differentiation of supporting cell types. The synthesis and degradation of DIF-1 were shown to be restricted to group 4. This suggests that the emergence of DIF-1 signalling caused increased cell-type specialization in this group.

Citing Articles

Emerging roles for diguanylate cyclase during the evolution of soma in dictyostelia.

Kawabe Y, Du Q, Narita T, Bell C, Schilde C, Kin K BMC Ecol Evol. 2023; 23(1):60.

PMID: 37803310 PMC: 10559540. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-023-02169-z.


Autophagy of the somatic stalk cells likely nurses the propagating spores of Dictyostelid social amoebas.

Du Q, Schaap P Open Res Eur. 2023; 2:104.

PMID: 36860212 PMC: 7614253. DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.14947.2.


Development of the dictyostelid Polysphondylium violaceum does not require secreted cAMP.

Kawabe Y, Schaap P Biol Open. 2023; 12(2).

PMID: 36688866 PMC: 9922732. DOI: 10.1242/bio.059728.


Novel RNAseq-Informed Cell-type Markers and Their Regulation Alter Paradigms of Developmental Control.

Forbes G, Chen Z, Kin K, Schaap P Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022; 10:899316.

PMID: 35602609 PMC: 9117722. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.899316.


Evolution of a novel cell type in Dictyostelia required gene duplication of a cudA-like transcription factor.

Kin K, Chen Z, Forbes G, Schaap P Curr Biol. 2021; 32(2):428-437.e4.

PMID: 34883046 PMC: 8808424. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.11.047.


References
1.
Kawabe Y, Enomoto T, Morio T, Urushihara H, Tanaka Y . LbrA, a protein predicted to have a role in vesicle trafficking, is necessary for normal morphogenesis in Polysphondylium pallidum. Gene. 1999; 239(1):75-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00379-0. View

2.
Gregg K, Cox E . Spatial and temporal expression of a Polysphondylium spore-specific gene. Dev Biol. 2000; 224(1):81-95. DOI: 10.1006/dbio.2000.9768. View

3.
Kay R, Thompson C . Cross-induction of cell types in Dictyostelium: evidence that DIF-1 is made by prespore cells. Development. 2001; 128(24):4959-66. DOI: 10.1242/dev.128.24.4959. View

4.
Maeda M, Sakamoto H, Iranfar N, Fuller D, Maruo T, Ogihara S . Changing patterns of gene expression in dictyostelium prestalk cell subtypes recognized by in situ hybridization with genes from microarray analyses. Eukaryot Cell. 2003; 2(3):627-37. PMC: 161460. DOI: 10.1128/EC.2.3.627-637.2003. View

5.
Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck J . MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19(12):1572-4. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180. View