» Articles » PMID: 25900319

Clinical Outcomes Related to Protein Delivery in a Critically Ill Population: A Multicenter, Multinational Observation Study

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2015 Apr 23
PMID 25900319
Citations 77
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Optimal intake of energy and protein is associated with improved outcomes, although outcomes relative to protein intake are very limited. Our purpose was to evaluate the impact of prescribed protein delivery on mortality and time to discharge alive (TDA) using data from the International Nutrition Survey 2013. We hypothesized that greater protein delivery would be associated with lower mortality and shorter TDA.

Methods: The sample included patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) ≥ 4 days (n = 2828) and a subsample in the ICU ≥ 12 days (n = 1584). Models were adjusted for evaluable nutrition days, age, body mass index, sex, admission type, acuity scores, and geographic region. Percentages of prescribed protein and energy intake were compared with mortality outcomes using logistic regression and with Cox proportional hazards for TDA.

Results: Mean intake for the 4-day sample was protein 51 g (60.5% of prescribed) and 1100 kcal (64.1% of prescribed); for the 12-day sample, mean intake was protein 57 g (66.7% of prescribed) and 1200 kcal (70.7% of prescribed). Achieving ≥ 80% of prescribed protein intake was associated with reduced mortality (4-day sample: odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.91; 12-day sample: OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.93), but ≥ 80% of prescribed energy intake was not. TDA was shorter with ≥ 80% prescribed protein (hazard ratio [HR], 1.25; 95% CI, 1.04-1.49) in the 12-day sample but longer with ≥ 80% prescribed energy in the 4-day sample (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.96).

Conclusion: Achieving at least 80% of prescribed protein intake may be important to survival and shorter TDA in ICU patients. Efforts to achieve prescribed protein intake should be maximized.

Citing Articles

Association between nutritional status, daily nutrition delivery and clinical outcomes of critically ill adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a protocol for Isfahan multicentre prospective observational cohort ICU study (the....

Shokri-Mashhadi N, Schlesinger S, Feizi A, Rajaii S, Nasiri Jounaghani M BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e090825.

PMID: 39843374 PMC: 11784128. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090825.


Application of metabolic phase-specific modified nutrition risk in critically ill score: a prospective observational study in critically ill patients.

Lee G, Kim Y, Park S, Park S, Lim S, Choi S Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1367727.

PMID: 39403394 PMC: 11471547. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1367727.


Impact of high-protein enteral nutrition on muscle preservation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial.

Liu C, He L, Zhang J, He J, Tian L, Zheng X J Health Popul Nutr. 2024; 43(1):152.

PMID: 39342405 PMC: 11439213. DOI: 10.1186/s41043-024-00633-0.


Advances in nutritional metabolic therapy to impede the progression of critical illness.

Chen W, Song J, Gong S Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1416910.

PMID: 39036495 PMC: 11259093. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1416910.


Gastric residual volume monitoring practices in UK intensive care units: A web-based survey.

Jenkins B, Calder P, Marino L J Intensive Care Soc. 2024; 25(2):156-163.

PMID: 38737302 PMC: 11086716. DOI: 10.1177/17511437231210483.