» Articles » PMID: 25890601

Job Demand and Control Interventions: a Stakeholder-centered Best-evidence Synthesis of Systematic Reviews on Workplace Disability

Overview
Date 2015 Apr 20
PMID 25890601
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Physical and psychological job demands in combination with the degree of control a worker has over task completion, play an important role in reducing stress. Occupational stress is an important, modifiable factor affecting work disability. However, the effectiveness of reducing job demands or increasing job control remains unclear, particularly for outcomes of interest to employers, such as absenteeism or productivity.

Objective: This systematic review reports on job demand and control interventions that impact absenteeism, productivity and financial outcomes.

Methods: A stakeholder-centered best-evidence synthesis was conducted with researcher and stakeholder collaboration throughout. Databases and grey literature were searched for systematic reviews between 2000 and 2012: Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DARE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, TRIP, health-evidence.ca, Rehab+, National Rehabilitation Information Center (NARIC), and Institute for Work and Health. Articles were assessed independently by two researchers for inclusion criteria and methodological quality. Differences were resolved through consensus.

Results: The search resulted in 3363 unique titles. After review of abstracts, 115 articles were retained for full-text review. 11 articles finally met the inclusion criteria and are summarized in this synthesis. The best level of evidence we found indicates that multimodal job demand reductions for either at-work or off-work workers will reduce disability-related absenteeism.

Conclusion: In general, the impacts of interventions that aim to reduce job demands or increase job control can be positive for the organization in terms of reducing absenteeism, increasing productivity and cost-effectiveness. However, more high quality research is needed to further assess the relationships and quantify effect sizes for the interventions and outcomes reviewed in this study.

Citing Articles

Trajectories of psychosocial working conditions and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a Swedish register-based cohort study.

Pan K, Almroth M, Nevriana A, Hemmingsson T, Kjellberg K, Falkstedt D Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023; 49(7):496-505.

PMID: 37522817 PMC: 10830330. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4111.


How effective are organizational-level interventions in improving the psychosocial work environment, health, and retention of workers? A systematic overview of systematic reviews.

Aust B, Moller J, Nordentoft M, Frydendall K, Bengtsen E, Jensen A Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023; 49(5):315-329.

PMID: 37158211 PMC: 10713994. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4097.


Psychosocial job stressors and risk of suicidal behavior - an observational study among Swedish men.

Aberg M, Staats E, Robertson J, Schioler L, Toren K, LaMontagne A Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022; 48(6):435-445.

PMID: 36044924 PMC: 9888439. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4039.


Sickness Absence and Disability Pension in the Trade and Retail Industry: A Prospective Cohort Study of 192,000 White-Collar Workers in Sweden.

Farrants K, Alexanderson K J Occup Environ Med. 2022; 64(11):912-919.

PMID: 35901218 PMC: 9640291. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002634.


Workplace improvements to support safe and sustained return to work: Suggestions from a survey of workers with permanent impairments.

Sears J, Edmonds A, Maceachen E, Fulton-Kehoe D Am J Ind Med. 2021; 64(9):731-743.

PMID: 34254343 PMC: 8362688. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23274.


References
1.
Steenstra I, Verbeek J, Heymans M, Bongers P . Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature. Occup Environ Med. 2005; 62(12):851-60. PMC: 1740930. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2004.015842. View

2.
Aas R, Tuntland H, Holte K, Roe C, Lund T, Marklund S . Workplace interventions for neck pain in workers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (4):CD008160. PMC: 6485986. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008160.pub2. View

3.
Maher C . A systematic review of workplace interventions to prevent low back pain. Aust J Physiother. 2001; 46(4):259-269. DOI: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60287-7. View

4.
Wai E, Roffey D, Bishop P, Kwon B, Dagenais S . Causal assessment of occupational bending or twisting and low back pain: results of a systematic review. Spine J. 2009; 10(1):76-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.06.005. View

5.
Josephson M, Pernold G, Harenstam A, Theorell T, Vingard E, Waldenstrom M . Differences in the association between psychosocial work conditions and physical work load in female- and male-dominated occupations. MUSIC-Norrtälje Study Group. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1999; 60(5):673-8. DOI: 10.1080/00028899908984490. View