» Articles » PMID: 25880970

Optimization of Dual-saturation Single Bolus Acquisition for Quantitative Cardiac Perfusion and Myocardial Blood Flow Maps

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2015 Apr 17
PMID 25880970
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In-vivo quantification of cardiac perfusion is of great research and clinical value. The dual-bolus strategy is universally used in clinical protocols but has known limitations. The dual-saturation acquisition strategy has been proposed as a more accurate alternative, but has not been validated across the wide range of perfusion rates encountered clinically. Dual-saturation acquisition also lacks a clinically-applicable procedure for optimizing parameter selection. Here we present a comprehensive validation study of dual-saturation strategy in vitro and in vivo.

Methods: The impact of saturation time and profile ordering in acquisitions was systematically analyzed in a phantom consisting of 15 tubes containing different concentrations of contrast agent. In-vivo experiments in healthy pigs were conducted to evaluate the effect of R2* on the definition of the arterial input function (AIF) and to evaluate the relationship between R2* and R1 variations during first-pass of the contrast agent. Quantification by dual-saturation perfusion was compared with the reference-standard dual-bolus strategy in 11 pigs with different grades of myocardial perfusion.

Results: Adequate flow estimation by the dual-saturation strategy is achieved with myocardial tissue saturation times around 100 ms (always <30 ms of AIF), with the lowest echo time, and following a signal model for contrast conversion that takes into account the residual R2* effect and profile ordering. There was a good correlation and agreement between myocardial perfusion quantitation by dual-saturation and dual-bolus techniques (R(2) = 0.92, mean difference of 0.1 ml/min/g; myocardial perfusion ranges between 0.18 and 3.93 ml/min/g).

Conclusions: The dual-saturation acquisition strategy produces accurate estimates of absolute myocardial perfusion in vivo. The procedure presented here can be applied with minimal interference in standard clinical procedures.

Citing Articles

Cardioprotection strategies for anthracycline cardiotoxicity.

Moreno-Arciniegas A, Cadiz L, Galan-Arriola C, Clemente-Moragon A, Ibanez B Basic Res Cardiol. 2024; 120(1):71-90.

PMID: 39249555 PMC: 11790697. DOI: 10.1007/s00395-024-01078-6.


High-resolution quantification of stress perfusion defects by cardiac magnetic resonance.

Scannell C, Crawley R, Alskaf E, Breeuwer M, Plein S, Chiribiri A Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2024; 2(1):qyae001.

PMID: 38283662 PMC: 10810243. DOI: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyae001.


Developing and evaluating a chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy in swine model by rest and stress CMR.

Zhuang B, Cui C, He J, Xu J, Wang X, Li L Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023; 40(2):249-260.

PMID: 37971706 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-023-02999-4.


A simplified method to correct saturation of arterial input function for cardiac magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion imaging: validation with simultaneously acquired PET.

Li R, Edalati M, Muccigrosso D, Lau J, Laforest R, Woodard P J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023; 25(1):35.

PMID: 37344848 PMC: 10286396. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-023-00945-w.


AI-AIF: artificial intelligence-based arterial input function for quantitative stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance.

Scannell C, Alskaf E, Sharrack N, Razavi R, Ourselin S, Young A Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2023; 4(1):12-21.

PMID: 36743875 PMC: 9890084. DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztac074.


References
1.
Ishida M, Schuster A, Morton G, Chiribiri A, Hussain S, Paul M . Development of a universal dual-bolus injection scheme for the quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011; 13:28. PMC: 3118114. DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-28. View

2.
Kim T, Pack N, Chen L, DiBella E . Quantification of myocardial perfusion using CMR with a radial data acquisition: comparison with a dual-bolus method. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010; 12:45. PMC: 2920886. DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-12-45. View

3.
Morton G, Chiribiri A, Ishida M, Hussain S, Schuster A, Indermuehle A . Quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60(16):1546-55. PMC: 7611225. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.05.052. View

4.
Chiribiri A, Schuster A, Ishida M, Hautvast G, Zarinabad N, Morton G . Perfusion phantom: An efficient and reproducible method to simulate myocardial first-pass perfusion measurements with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med. 2012; 69(3):698-707. PMC: 3593172. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24299. View

5.
Blankstein R, Osborne M, Naya M, Waller A, Kim C, Murthy V . Cardiac positron emission tomography enhances prognostic assessments of patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 63(4):329-36. PMC: 3955730. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.022. View