» Articles » PMID: 25851159

Practice Patterns of Sedation for Colonoscopy

Overview
Date 2015 Apr 9
PMID 25851159
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Sedative and analgesic medications have been used routinely for decades to provide patient comfort, reduce procedure time, and improve examination quality during colonoscopy.

Objective: To evaluate trends of sedation during colonoscopy in the United States.

Setting: Endoscopic data repository of U.S. gastroenterology practices (Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative, CORI database from 2000 until 2013).

Patients: The study population was made up of patients undergoing a total of 1,385,436 colonoscopies.

Interventions: Colonoscopy without any intervention or with mucosal biopsy, polypectomy, various means of hemostasis, luminal dilation, stent placement, or ablation.

Main Outcome Measurements: Dose of midazolam, diazepam, fentanyl, meperidine, diphenhydramine, promethazine, and propofol used for sedation during colonoscopy.

Results: During the past 14 years, midazolam, fentanyl, and propofol have become the most commonly used sedatives for colonoscopy. Except for benzodiazepines, which were dosed higher in women than men, equal doses of sedation were given to female and male patients. White patients were given higher doses than other ethnic groups undergoing sedation for colonoscopy. Except for histamine-1 receptor antagonists, all sedative medications were given at lower doses to patients with increasing age. The dose of sedatives was higher in colonoscopies associated with procedural interventions or of long duration.

Limitations: Potential for incomplete or incorrect documentation in the database.

Conclusion: The findings reflect on colonoscopy practice in the United States during the last 14 years and provide an incentive for future research on how sex and ethnicity influence sedation practices.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of ciprofol for gastroscopy in patients with obesity: a randomised clinical controlled trial using different weight-based dosing scales.

Xie D, Zhang Y, Li F, Yang Y, Che M, Li G BMC Anesthesiol. 2025; 25(1):112.

PMID: 40025458 PMC: 11874440. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-025-02974-7.


Propofol sedation does not improve measures of colonoscopy quality but increase cost - findings from a large population-based cohort study.

Rahman S, Cipriano L, McDonald C, Cocco S, Hindi Z, Chakraborty D EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 70:102503.

PMID: 38495522 PMC: 10940905. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102503.


The Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam Besylate Combined with Esketamine for Outpatient Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.

Li W, Zhao J, Hao R, Wang S, Chen M, Liu H Drug Des Devel Ther. 2023; 17:2875-2887.

PMID: 37746114 PMC: 10516197. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S425860.


Advances in Analgosedation and Periprocedural Care for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Skiljic S, Budrovac D, Cicvaric A, Neskovic N, Kvolik S Life (Basel). 2023; 13(2).

PMID: 36836830 PMC: 9962362. DOI: 10.3390/life13020473.


Interpreting the results from the first randomised controlled trial of colonoscopy: does it save lives?.

Powell K, Prasad V BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023; 28(5):306-308.

PMID: 36754585 PMC: 10579474. DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112155.


References
1.
Keeffe E, OConnor K . 1989 A/S/G/E survey of endoscopic sedation and monitoring practices. Gastrointest Endosc. 1990; 36(3 Suppl):S13-8. View

2.
Ahmed N, Pelletier V, Winter K, Albatineh A . Factors explaining racial/ethnic disparities in rates of physician recommendation for colorectal cancer screening. Am J Public Health. 2013; 103(7):e91-9. PMC: 3682597. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301034. View

3.
Lee E, Teeple M, Bagrodia N, Hannallah J, Yazzie N, Adamas-Rappaport W . Postoperative pain assessment and analgesic administration in Native American patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA Surg. 2013; 148(1):91-3. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.682. View

4.
Sly J, Edwards T, Shelton R, Jandorf L . Identifying barriers to colonoscopy screening for nonadherent African American participants in a patient navigation intervention. Health Educ Behav. 2012; 40(4):449-57. PMC: 3695062. DOI: 10.1177/1090198112459514. View

5.
Burgess D, Gravely A, Nelson D, Van Ryn M, Bair M, Kerns R . A national study of racial differences in pain screening rates in the VA health care system. Clin J Pain. 2012; 29(2):118-23. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31826a86ae. View