» Articles » PMID: 25845713

Sensitivity of Chemical Shift-encoded Fat Quantification to Calibration of Fat MR Spectrum

Overview
Journal Magn Reson Med
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Radiology
Date 2015 Apr 8
PMID 25845713
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of different fat spectral models on proton density fat fraction quantification using chemical shift-encoded MRI (CSE-MRI).

Methods: In a simulation study, spectral models of fat were compared pairwise. Comparison of magnitude fitting and mixed fitting was performed over a range of echo times and fat fractions. In vivo acquisitions from 41 patients were reconstructed using seven published spectral models of fat. T2-corrected stimulated echo acquisition mode MR spectroscopy was used as a reference.

Results: The simulations demonstrated that imperfectly calibrated spectral models of fat result in biases that depend on echo times and fat fraction. Mixed fitting was more robust against this bias than magnitude fitting. Multipeak spectral models showed much smaller differences among themselves than from the single-peak spectral model. In vivo studies showed that all multipeak models agreed better (for mixed fitting, the slope ranged from 0.967 to 1.045 using linear regression) with the reference standard than the single-peak model (for mixed fitting, slope = 0.76).

Conclusion: It is essential to use a multipeak fat model for accurate quantification of fat with CSE-MRI. Furthermore, fat quantification techniques using multipeak fat models are comparable, and no specific choice of spectral model has been shown to be superior to the rest.

Citing Articles

Reproducibility of proton density fat fraction assessment of thigh muscle in a multi-site, multi-vendor cohort study at 10 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Eck B, Gaj S, Lartey R, Li M, Kim J, Winalski C Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(12):8099-8118.

PMID: 39698646 PMC: 11651994. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-287.


Free-Breathing High-Resolution, Swap-Free, and Motion-Corrected Water/Fat Separation in Pediatric Abdominal MRI.

Nosrati R, Calakli F, Afacan O, Pelkola K, Nichols R, Connaughton P Invest Radiol. 2024; 59(12):805-812.

PMID: 38857418 PMC: 11560742. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000001092.


Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: A comprehensive updated review of risk factors, symptoms, and treatment.

Savari F, Mard S Heliyon. 2024; 10(7):e28468.

PMID: 38689985 PMC: 11059522. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28468.


Linearity and bias of proton density fat fraction across the full dynamic range of 0-100%: a multiplatform, multivendor phantom study using 1.5T and 3T MRI at two sites.

Hu H, Chen H, Hernando D MAGMA. 2024; 37(4):551-563.

PMID: 38349454 PMC: 11428149. DOI: 10.1007/s10334-024-01148-9.


CEST-MRI for body oncologic imaging: are we there yet?.

Vinogradov E, Keupp J, Dimitrov I, Seiler S, Pedrosa I NMR Biomed. 2023; 36(6):e4906.

PMID: 36640112 PMC: 10200773. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4906.


References
1.
Reeder S, Bice E, Yu H, Hernando D, Pineda A . On the performance of T2* correction methods for quantification of hepatic fat content. Magn Reson Med. 2011; 67(2):389-404. PMC: 4151133. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23016. View

2.
Reeder S, McKenzie C, Pineda A, Yu H, Shimakawa A, Brau A . Water-fat separation with IDEAL gradient-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 25(3):644-52. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20831. View

3.
Bydder M, Hamilton G, Yokoo T, Sirlin C . Optimal phased-array combination for spectroscopy. Magn Reson Imaging. 2008; 26(6):847-50. PMC: 2868913. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.01.050. View

4.
Schwenzer N, Machann J, Haap M, Martirosian P, Schraml C, Liebig G . T2* relaxometry in liver, pancreas, and spleen in a healthy cohort of one hundred twenty-nine subjects-correlation with age, gender, and serum ferritin. Invest Radiol. 2008; 43(12):854-60. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181862413. View

5.
Bydder M, Yokoo T, Hamilton G, Middleton M, Chavez A, Schwimmer J . Relaxation effects in the quantification of fat using gradient echo imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 26(3):347-59. PMC: 2386876. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2007.08.012. View