» Articles » PMID: 25829690

Evaluation of Push-out Bond Strength of Endosequence BC Sealer with Lateral Condensation and Thermoplasticized Technique: An in Vitro Study

Overview
Journal J Conserv Dent
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2015 Apr 2
PMID 25829690
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: To evaluate and compare the push-out bond strength of root filled with Endosequence BC, AH Plus and Endomethasone N sealers using lateral condensation and thermoplasticized technique.

Materials And Methods: Thirty mandibular premolars with completely formed roots were selected. Teeth were decoronated, working length was determined. Instrumentation and irrigation were performed. Teeth were then obturated with Group 1-Cold lateral compaction (n = 15) or Group 2-Thermoplasticized technique (n = 15). Each group was again subdivided into three depending on the sealers used. Teeth in each subgroup were then sectioned perpendicularly to the long axis to obtain a disc of 2 mm each, which were then subjected to micro push-out test. Data was analyzed with ANOVA.

Results: AH Plus sealer in Group 1 showed the maximum (4.77 ± 1.67 MPa) push-out bond strength among the three sealers and between two groups. The mean strength of Bioceramic sealer was lower in Group 1 (2.62 ± 0.76 MPa) and higher in Group 2 (3.52 ± 0.69 MPa).

Conclusions: The push-out bond strength of Endosequence BC sealer was lower than the AH Plus root canal sealer with cold lateral condensation technique.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the Effects of Retro-Cavity Preconditioning with or Without Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid on Root Surface pH and Dislodgement Resistance of NeoMTA2 and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Flow Retro-Fills: An Ex Vivo Investigation.

Khedmat S, Abaee S, Assadian H, Signore A, Benedicenti S J Funct Biomater. 2025; 16(1).

PMID: 39852559 PMC: 11766056. DOI: 10.3390/jfb16010003.


Comparative Assessment of Push-Out Bond Strength and Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Different Calcium-Silicate-Based Endodontic Sealers.

Merfea M, Cimpean S, Chiorean R, Antoniac A, Delean A, Badea I Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(12).

PMID: 39727454 PMC: 11675060. DOI: 10.3390/dj12120397.


Comparative evaluation of the effect of three different obturation techniques on push-out bond strength of AH Plus Bioceramic and EndoCeramic sealers: An study.

Vemuri S, Rachamadugu E, Naveena T, Garlapati R, Bolla N, Basam R J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024; 27(10):1026-1031.

PMID: 39583269 PMC: 11581368. DOI: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_345_24.


Immediate and delayed shear bond strength evaluation between root canal sealers and restorative materials: an experimental study.

Alghazaly A, Mirah M, Saleh S BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1217.

PMID: 39402532 PMC: 11475602. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04993-1.


Effectiveness of tricalcium silicate-based cements: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DAmico G, Muwaquet Rodriguez S Saudi Dent J. 2024; 36(2):208-213.

PMID: 38419984 PMC: 10897538. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.10.015.


References
1.
Carneiro S, Sousa-Neto M, Rached Jr F, Miranda C, Silva S, Silva-Sousa Y . Push-out strength of root fillings with or without thermomechanical compaction. Int Endod J. 2012; 45(9):821-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02039.x. View

2.
Van Meerbeek B, de Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P . Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003; 28(3):215-35. View

3.
Sjogren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K . Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 1990; 16(10):498-504. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80180-4. View

4.
Caicedo R, VON Fraunhofer J . The properties of endodontic sealer cements. J Endod. 1988; 14(11):527-34. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80084-0. View

5.
Grossman L . Physical properties of root canal cements. J Endod. 1976; 2(6):166-75. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(76)80059-3. View