» Articles » PMID: 17368325

Monoblocks in Root Canals: a Hypothetical or a Tangible Goal

Overview
Journal J Endod
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2007 Mar 21
PMID 17368325
Citations 106
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The term monoblock has become familiar in the endodontic literature with recent interest in the application of dentin adhesive technology to endodontics. Endodontic monoblocks have generated controversial discussions among academicians and clinicians as to whether they are able to improve the quality of seal in root fillings and to strengthen roots. This review attempts to provide a broader meaning to the term monoblock and to see how this definition may be applied to the materials that have been used in the past and present for rehabilitation of the root canal space. The potential of currently available bondable materials to achieve mechanically homogeneous units with root dentin is then discussed in relation to the classical concept in which the term monoblock was first employed in restorative dentistry and subsequently in endodontics.

Citing Articles

Comparative analysis of Biodentine and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate repair High Plasticity in reinforcing roots with perforation: An in vitro study.

Anija R, Kalita C, Satheesh S, Seal M, Kalita T, Saikia A J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025; 28(1):63-67.

PMID: 39974673 PMC: 11835356. DOI: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_711_24.


Evaluatıon of stress dıstrıbutıon by applıed dıfferent forces on ımmature maxıllary central teeth wıth dıfferent treatment optıons: a laboratory fınıte element stress analysıs.

Cetinkaya A, Ayranci L BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):3.

PMID: 39748342 PMC: 11697966. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05360-w.


An In Vitro Comparative Analysis of Physico-Mechanical Properties of Commercial and Experimental Bioactive Endodontic Sealers.

Kashaf A, Alonaizan F, Almulhim K, Almohazey D, Alotaibi D, Akhtar S Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(11).

PMID: 39593739 PMC: 11591320. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11111079.


Comparison of Different Obturation Techniques in the Dentinal Tubule Penetration of EndoSequence® Bioceramic Sealer HiFlow™: An In-Vitro Study.

Mobayed M, Ayoubi H, Achour H, Alsayed Tolibah Y Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71155.

PMID: 39525185 PMC: 11548115. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71155.


Immediate and delayed shear bond strength evaluation between root canal sealers and restorative materials: an experimental study.

Alghazaly A, Mirah M, Saleh S BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1217.

PMID: 39402532 PMC: 11475602. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04993-1.


References
1.
Segerstrom S, Astback J, Ekstrand K . A retrospective long term study of teeth restored with prefabricated carbon fiber reinforced epoxy resin posts. Swed Dent J. 2006; 30(1):1-8. View

2.
Williams C, Loushine R, Weller R, Pashley D, Tay F . A comparison of cohesive strength and stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha. J Endod. 2006; 32(6):553-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.08.002. View

3.
Koch K, Brave D . A new endodontic obturation technique. Dent Today. 2006; 25(5):102, 104-7. View

4.
Teixeira F . Ideal obturation using synthetic root-filling systems: coronal sealing and fracture resistance. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2006; 18(3):S7-11. View

5.
Kim J, Choi Y, Cho B, Son H, Lee I, Um C . Effect of light-cure time of adhesive resin on the thickness of the oxygen-inhibited layer and the microtensile bond strength to dentin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005; 78(1):115-23. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30463. View