» Articles » PMID: 25826635

Current Concepts, Classification, and Results in Short Stem Hip Arthroplasty

Overview
Journal Orthopedics
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2015 Apr 1
PMID 25826635
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Various short hip stems have been introduced with differing implant concepts of femoral fixation and implant length. There is a lack of proper classification for short hip stems, with a clear and accepted definition for implant length and extent of bone preservation in the metaphyseal and diaphyseal femur. This study analyzed the length of short hip stems. Stems were divided into collum, partial collum, and trochanter-sparing implants. An additional category was added, trochanter harming, which was defined as interruption of the circumferential integrity of the femoral neck. For all of the femoral components described, the designs were compared, excluding stems with insufficient clinical data. The 15 finally selected stems were classified as collum (1 stem), partial collum (7 stems), trochanter sparing (4 stems), and trochanter harming (3 stems). Mid-term results (>5 years of follow-up) were available for only 3 designs in the partial collum group. Taking into account the results of short-term studies (<5 years of follow-up), the femoral revision rate per 100 observed component years was <1 for most total hip arthroplasties. However, the studies varied greatly regarding level of significance, and short hip stems without published results are available commercially. Short hip stems cannot be circumscribed by a simple length limit. For some designs, clinical data collected from large patient cohorts showed a survivorship comparable to traditional stems. In cases that must be revised, this often can be performed with a conventional primary stem, fulfilling the promise to preserve bone for potential future revisions in younger patients.

Citing Articles

Comparative study of fitmore and CLS stems in total hip arthroplasty: midterm clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Evola F, Caldaria A, Costarella L, DAmico A, DAgata V, Vecchio M Musculoskelet Surg. 2025; .

PMID: 39920536 DOI: 10.1007/s12306-025-00885-x.


Mid-term outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty with a cemented short stem in an elderly patient cohort.

Marega L, Gnagni P, Marega C, Marega F Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 145(1):96.

PMID: 39729135 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05734-3.


Native hip geometry restoration in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of eight different short stems.

Sinno E, Piccolo Y, Scrivano M, Rovere G, Damanti M, Panegrossi G Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024; 34(6):3309-3317.

PMID: 39158721 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-04075-6.


Total Hip Replacement with a Fully Hydroxyapatite-Coated Shortened Stem: Five- to Thirteen-Year Follow-Up Results.

Marques Lopez F, Pares Alfonso I, Donaire Hoyas D, Ruiz Morales G, Pons M, Lizano Diez X J Clin Med. 2024; 13(9).

PMID: 38731186 PMC: 11084338. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092657.


Mid-Term Outcomes of a Short Modular Neck-Preserving Cementless Hip Stem: A Retrospective Study With a 6-Year Minimum Follow-Up.

Carnovale M, De Meo D, Guarascio G, Martini P, Cera G, Persiani P Arthroplast Today. 2024; 27:101387.

PMID: 38707589 PMC: 11068503. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101387.