» Articles » PMID: 25822061

Impact of Anatomic Location on Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer: Superior Outcome for Intraluminal Tumour Recurrence

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2015 Mar 31
PMID 25822061
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Local recurrence of rectal cancer after curative surgery predicts patients' prognosis. The correlation between the exact anatomic location of tumour recurrence and patients' survival is still under debate. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the impact of the exact location of recurrent rectal cancer on post-operative morbidity and survival.

Methods: This is a retrospective study including 90 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer. The location of tumour recurrence was classified into intraluminal and extraluminal recurrence. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to determine the impact on post-operative morbidity and survival.

Results: Patients' survival with intraluminal recurrence was significantly longer compared to patients with extraluminal recurrence (p = 0.027). Curative resection was associated with prolonged survival in univariate and multivariable analyses (p = 0.0001) and was more often achieved in patients with intraluminal recurrence (p = 0.024). Survival of curative resected patients with intraluminal recurrence was significantly longer compared to curatively resected patients with extraluminal recurrence (p = 0.0001). The rate of post-operative morbidity between intraluminal and extraluminal recurrence was not statistically different (p = 0.59).

Conclusion: Based on the present investigation, intraluminal recurrence is associated with superior outcome. Post-operative morbidity did not differ significantly between both groups.

Citing Articles

Post recurrence survival in early versus late period and its prognostic factors in rectal cancer patients.

Shahabi F, Mehri A, Abdollahi A, Hoshyar S, Ghahramani A, Noei M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17661.

PMID: 39085286 PMC: 11291732. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67852-7.


Outcomes and prognostic factors of multimodality treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer with curative intent.

Bird T, Ngan S, Chu J, Kroon R, Lynch A, Heriot A Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018; 33(4):393-401.

PMID: 29468354 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-2985-y.

References
1.
Rahbari N, Ulrich A, Bruckner T, Munter M, Nickles A, Contin P . Surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer in the era of total mesorectal excision: is there still a chance for cure?. Ann Surg. 2011; 253(3):522-33. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182096d4f. View

2.
Nielsen M, Rasmussen P, Pedersen B, Hagemann-Madsen R, Lindegaard J, Laurberg S . Early and Late Outcomes of Surgery for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer: A Prospective 10-Year Study in the Total Mesorectal Excision Era. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22(8):2677-84. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4317-y. View

3.
Simunovic M, Sexton R, Rempel E, Moran B, Heald R . Optimal preoperative assessment and surgery for rectal cancer may greatly limit the need for radiotherapy. Br J Surg. 2003; 90(8):999-1003. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4210. View

4.
de Chaisemartin C, Penna C, Goere D, Benoist S, Beauchet A, Julie C . Presentation and prognosis of local recurrence after total mesorectal excision. Colorectal Dis. 2008; 11(1):60-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01537.x. View

5.
McDermott F, Hughes E, Pihl E, Johnson W, Price A . Local recurrence after potentially curative resection for rectal cancer in a series of 1008 patients. Br J Surg. 1985; 72(1):34-7. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800720115. View