» Articles » PMID: 25813014

Dual-time-point O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET for Grading of Cerebral Gliomas

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2015 Mar 28
PMID 25813014
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic potential of dual-time-point imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) using O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ((18)F-FET) for non-invasive grading of cerebral gliomas compared with a dynamic approach.

Methods: Thirty-six patients with histologically confirmed cerebral gliomas (21 primary, 15 recurrent; 24 high-grade, 12 low-grade) underwent dynamic PET from 0 to 50 min post-injection (p.i.) of (18)F-FET, and additionally from 70 to 90 min p.i. Mean tumour-to-brain ratios (TBRmean) of (18)F-FET uptake were determined in early (20-40 min p.i.) and late (70-90 min p.i.) examinations. Time-activity curves (TAC) of the tumours from 0 to 50 min after injection were assigned to different patterns. The diagnostic accuracy of changes of (18)F-FET uptake between early and late examinations for tumour grading was compared to that of curve pattern analysis from 0 to 50 min p.i. of (18)F-FET.

Results: The diagnostic accuracy of changes of the TBRmean of (18)F-FET PET uptake between early and late examinations for the identification of HGG was 81% (sensitivity 83%; specificity 75%; cutoff - 8%; p < 0.001), and 83% for curve pattern analysis (sensitivity 88%; specificity 75%; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Dual-time-point imaging of (18)F-FET uptake in gliomas achieves diagnostic accuracy for tumour grading that is similar to the more time-consuming dynamic data acquisition protocol.

Key Points: • Dual-time-point imaging is equivalent to dynamic FET PET for grading of gliomas. • Dual-time-point imaging is less time consuming than dynamic FET PET. • Costs can be reduced due to higher patient throughput. • Reduced imaging time increases patient comfort and sedation might be avoided. • Quicker image interpretation is possible, as no curve evaluation is necessary.

Citing Articles

Autoradiography of Intracerebral Tumours in the Chick Embryo Model: A Feasibility Study Using Different PET Tracers.

Krause S, Florea A, Choi C, Worthoff W, Heinzel A, Fischer S Mol Imaging Biol. 2025; .

PMID: 39838234 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-025-01983-9.


Pre-operative dual-time-point [F]FET PET differentiates CDKN2A/B loss and PIK3CA mutation status in adult-type diffuse glioma: a single-center prospective study.

Lee D, Oh J, Kim J, Oh M, Oh S, Lee S Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 52(2):669-682.

PMID: 39365462 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06935-z.


Contribution of [F]FET PET in the Management of Gliomas, from Diagnosis to Follow-Up: A Review.

Robert J, Leclerc A, Ducloie M, Emery E, Agostini D, Vigne J Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024; 17(9).

PMID: 39338390 PMC: 11435125. DOI: 10.3390/ph17091228.


Impact of improved dead time correction on the quantification accuracy of a dedicated BrainPET scanner.

Issa A, Scheins J, Tellmann L, Regio Brambilla C, Lohmann P, Rota-Kops E PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0296357.

PMID: 38578749 PMC: 10997125. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296357.


Delineation and agreement of FET PET biological volumes in glioblastoma: results of the nuclear medicine credentialing program from the prospective, multi-centre trial evaluating FET PET In Glioblastoma (FIG) study-TROG 18.06.

Barry N, Francis R, Ebert M, Koh E, Rowshanfarzad P, Hassan G Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023; 50(13):3970-3981.

PMID: 37563351 PMC: 10611835. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06371-5.


References
1.
Popperl G, Kreth F, Mehrkens J, Herms J, Seelos K, Koch W . FET PET for the evaluation of untreated gliomas: correlation of FET uptake and uptake kinetics with tumour grading. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007; 34(12):1933-42. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-007-0534-y. View

2.
McConathy J, Yu W, Jarkas N, Seo W, Schuster D, Goodman M . Radiohalogenated nonnatural amino acids as PET and SPECT tumor imaging agents. Med Res Rev. 2011; 32(4):868-905. DOI: 10.1002/med.20250. View

3.
Jansen N, Graute V, Armbruster L, Suchorska B, Lutz J, Eigenbrod S . MRI-suspected low-grade glioma: is there a need to perform dynamic FET PET?. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012; 39(6):1021-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-012-2109-9. View

4.
Pauleit D, Floeth F, Hamacher K, Riemenschneider M, Reifenberger G, Muller H . O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET combined with MRI improves the diagnostic assessment of cerebral gliomas. Brain. 2005; 128(Pt 3):678-87. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh399. View

5.
Paulus W, PEIFFER J . Intratumoral histologic heterogeneity of gliomas. A quantitative study. Cancer. 1989; 64(2):442-7. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890715)64:2<442::aid-cncr2820640217>3.0.co;2-s. View