» Articles » PMID: 17763978

Non-invasive Grading of Brain Tumours Using Dynamic Amino Acid PET Imaging: Does It Work for 11C-methionine?

Overview
Date 2007 Sep 4
PMID 17763978
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Static imaging of amino acids does not allow differentiation of low versus high grade brain tumours. It has been shown that dynamic imaging of the amino acid analogue (18)F-fluoroethyltyrosine (FET) can achieve this goal. In many centres, (11)C-methionine (MET) is used for tumour imaging, but no clinical studies on the use of dynamic scanning for grading have been performed.

Methods: Thirty-four patients with primary brain glioma and histopathological confirmation were retrospectively studied using 40 min dynamic MET-PET with 220 MBq 11C-methionine. In relation to histopathological grading, various metabolic indices and temporal parameters as documented by Poepperl et al. (JNM 2006;47:393-403) were analyzed.

Results: None of the evaluated static or temporal parameters allowed discrimination between high and low grade tumours. On average, low grade tumours showed washout after the initial uptake maximum, while both increases and decreases were seen for high grade tumours. Only the relative early versus late uptake ratio showed a trend towards significance (-0.16 +/- 0.17 for low grade versus 0.01 +/- 0.25 for high grade; p = 0.07).

Conclusion: Unlike FET-PET, the uptake characteristics of MET-PET do not allow classification of low and high grade tumours on an individual patient basis. Since literature data indicate that both tracers have a similar performance regarding biopsy location, tumour delineation, and detection of recurrence, FET-PET should be advocated over MET-PET as its uptake mechanism also allows noninvasive grading in glioma.

Citing Articles

Impact of [C]methionine PET with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction on glioma grades based on new WHO 2021 classification.

Wagatsuma K, Ikemoto K, Inaji M, Kamitaka Y, Hara S, Tamura K Ann Nucl Med. 2024; 38(5):400-407.

PMID: 38466549 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-024-01911-x.


F-Fluoroethyl-L Tyrosine Positron Emission Tomography Radiomics in the Differentiation of Treatment-Related Changes from Disease Progression in Patients with Glioblastoma.

Manzarbeitia-Arroba B, Hodolic M, Pichler R, Osipova O, Soriano-Castrejon A, Garcia-Vicente A Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(1).

PMID: 38201621 PMC: 10778283. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010195.


Tracers progress for positron emission tomography imaging of glial-related disease.

Jia H, Xie T J Biomed Res. 2022; 36(5):321-335.

PMID: 36131689 PMC: 9548440. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.36.20220017.


Challenges and opportunities for advanced neuroimaging of glioblastoma.

Henssen D, Meijer F, Verburg F, Smits M Br J Radiol. 2022; 96(1141):20211232.

PMID: 36062962 PMC: 10997013. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20211232.


Dynamic C-Methionine PET-CT: Prognostic Factors for Disease Progression and Survival in Patients with Suspected Glioma Recurrence.

Mattoli M, Trevisi G, Scolozzi V, Capotosti A, Cocciolillo F, Marini I Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(19).

PMID: 34638262 PMC: 8508090. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194777.


References
1.
Riemann B, Papke K, Hoess N, Kuwert T, Weckesser M, Matheja P . Noninvasive grading of untreated gliomas: a comparative study of MR imaging and 3-(iodine 123)-L-alpha-methyltyrosine SPECT. Radiology. 2002; 225(2):567-74. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2252011431. View

2.
Weber W, Dick S, Reidl G, Dzewas B, Busch R, Feldmann H . Correlation between postoperative 3-[(123)I]iodo-L-alpha-methyltyrosine uptake and survival in patients with gliomas. J Nucl Med. 2001; 42(8):1144-50. View

3.
Jager P, Vaalburg W, Pruim J, De Vries E, Langen K, Piers D . Radiolabeled amino acids: basic aspects and clinical applications in oncology. J Nucl Med. 2001; 42(3):432-45. View

4.
Jacobs A, Kracht L, Gossmann A, Ruger M, Thomas A, Thiel A . Imaging in neurooncology. NeuroRx. 2005; 2(2):333-47. PMC: 1064995. DOI: 10.1602/neurorx.2.2.333. View

5.
Popperl G, Kreth F, Herms J, Koch W, Mehrkens J, Gildehaus F . Analysis of 18F-FET PET for grading of recurrent gliomas: is evaluation of uptake kinetics superior to standard methods?. J Nucl Med. 2006; 47(3):393-403. View