» Articles » PMID: 25812658

Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Pancreatic Lesions

Overview
Date 2015 Mar 28
PMID 25812658
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (EUS-FNAC) is currently the most commonly used procedure for obtaining cytologic specimens of the pancreas. It is accurate, minimally invasive, safe and cost-effective. However, there is discrepancy between cytological and surgical diagnoses. This study was aimed at evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNAC of the pancreas.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 191 cases of pancreatic lesions initially diagnosed by EUS-FNAC with subsequent histological diagnosis between 2010 and 2012 in the Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital. Cytologic and surgical diagnoses were categorized into five groups: negative, benign, atypical, malignant, and insufficient for diagnosis. Subsequently, 167 cases with satisfactory yield in both surgical and cytology specimens were statistically analyzed to determine correlations with diagnosis.

Results: In comparison to surgical diagnoses, cytologic diagnoses were true-positive in 103 cases (61.7%), true-negative in 28 cases (16.8%), false-positive in 9 cases (5.4%), and false-negative in 27 cases (16.1%). The diagnostic accuracy was 78.4%, sensitivity was 79.2%, and specificity was 75.7%. The positive predictive value was 92.0%, and negative predictive value was 50.9%.

Conclusions: EUS-FNAC has high accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value. Overcoming the limitations of EUS-FNAC will make it a useful and reliable diagnostic tool for accurate evaluation of pancreatic lesions.

Citing Articles

miR-6855-5p Enhances Radioresistance and Promotes Migration of Pancreatic Cancer by Inducing Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition via Suppressing FOXA1: Potential of Plasma Exosomal miR-6855-5p as an Indicator of Radiosensitivity in Patients with....

Ueda H, Takahashi H, Kobayashi S, Kubo M, Sasaki K, Iwagami Y Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 32(2):720-735.

PMID: 39269634 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16115-w.


Comparison of the diagnostic yield of rapid versus non-rapid onsite evaluation in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of solid pancreatic lesions.

Jaleel R, George J, Thomas A, Patel L, John A, Kurien R Ann Gastroenterol. 2024; 37(3):371-376.

PMID: 38779649 PMC: 11107408. DOI: 10.20524/aog.2024.0879.


Reporting Pancreatic FNAC using the Papanicolaou System: Still a Diagnostic Challenge.

Verma P, Goyal S, Tyagi R, Ghuman M, Mahajan R, Selhi A J Cytol. 2024; 41(2):123-130.

PMID: 38779600 PMC: 11108040. DOI: 10.4103/joc.joc_90_23.


Diagnosing and monitoring pancreatic cancer through cell-free DNA methylation: progress and prospects.

Garcia-Ortiz M, Cano-Ramirez P, Toledano-Fonseca M, Aranda E, Rodriguez-Ariza A Biomark Res. 2023; 11(1):88.

PMID: 37798621 PMC: 10552233. DOI: 10.1186/s40364-023-00528-y.


Cancer-derived small extracellular vesicles: emerging biomarkers and therapies for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma diagnosis/prognosis and treatment.

Zhang W, Campbell D, Walsh B, Packer N, Liu D, Wang Y J Nanobiotechnology. 2022; 20(1):446.

PMID: 36242076 PMC: 9563798. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-022-01641-0.


References
1.
Kawamoto S, Siegelman S, Hruban R, Fishman E . Lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (autoimmune pancreatitis): evaluation with multidetector CT. Radiographics. 2008; 28(1):157-70. DOI: 10.1148/rg.281065188. View

2.
Jung K, Won Y, Kong H, Oh C, Lee D, Lee J . Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2011. Cancer Res Treat. 2014; 46(2):109-23. PMC: 4022819. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2014.46.2.109. View

3.
Matsumoto K, Takeda Y, Harada K, Horie Y, Yashima K, Murawaki Y . Effect of pancreatic juice cytology and/or endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for pancreatic tumor. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 29(1):223-7. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12332. View

4.
Abraham S, Leach S, Yeo C, Cameron J, Murakata L, Boitnott J . Eosinophilic pancreatitis and increased eosinophils in the pancreas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003; 27(3):334-42. DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200303000-00006. View

5.
Yoshinaga S, Suzuki H, Oda I, Saito Y . Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Dig Endosc. 2011; 23 Suppl 1:29-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2011.01112.x. View