A Role of Right Middle Frontal Gyrus in Reorienting of Attention: a Case Study

Overview

Journal Front Syst Neurosci

Specialty Neurology

Date 2015 Mar 19

PMID 25784862

Citations 233

Authors

Shruti Japee

Kelsey Holiday

Maureen D Satyshur

Ikuko Mukai

Leslie G Ungerleider

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The right middle fontal gyrus (MFG) has been proposed to be a site of convergence of the dorsal and ventral attention networks, by serving as a circuit-breaker to interrupt ongoing endogenous attentional processes in the dorsal network and reorient attention to an exogenous stimulus. Here, we probed the contribution of the right MFG to both endogenous and exogenous attention by comparing performance on an orientation discrimination task of a patient with a right MFG resection and a group of healthy controls. On endogenously cued trials, participants were shown a central cue that predicted with 90% accuracy the location of a subsequent peri-threshold Gabor patch stimulus. On exogenously cued trials, a cue appeared briefly at one of two peripheral locations, followed by a variable inter-stimulus interval (ISI; range 0-700 ms) and a Gabor patch in the same or opposite location as the cue. Behavioral data showed that for endogenous, and short ISI exogenous trials, valid cues facilitated responses compared to invalid cues, for both the patient and controls. However, at long ISIs, the patient exhibited difficulty in reverting to top-down attentional control, once the facilitatory effect of the exogenous cue had dissipated. When explicitly cued during long ISIs to attend to both stimulus locations, the patient was able to engage successfully in top-down control. This result indicates that the right MFG may play an important role in reorienting attention from exogenous to endogenous attentional control. Resting state fMRI data revealed that the right superior parietal lobule and right orbitofrontal cortex, showed significantly higher correlations with a left MFG seed region (a region tightly coupled with the right MFG in controls) in the patient relative to controls. We hypothesize that this paradoxical increase in cortical coupling represents a compensatory mechanism in the patient to offset the loss of function of the resected tissue in right prefrontal cortex.

Citing Articles

Cognitive control: modeling the impact on mental health.

Alker L Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1452714.

PMID: 40062198 PMC: 11885272. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1452714.

Cognitive impairment assessed by static and dynamic changes of spontaneous brain activity during end stage renal disease patients on early hemodialysis.

Wu Y, Li R, Jiang G, Yang N, Liu M, Chen Y Front Neurol. 2025; 16:1510321.

PMID: 40040917 PMC: 11877905. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1510321.

A resting-state fMRI cross-sectional study of cardiorespiratory fitness decline after stroke.

Qu Q, Zhang K, Wang H, Zhu J, Lin Y, Jia J Front Neurol. 2025; 16:1465467.

PMID: 40040907 PMC: 11877007. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1465467.

The role of human intraparietal sulcus in evidence accumulation revealed by EEG and model-informed fMRI: IPS accumulates evidence during decision-making.

Wongtrakun J, Zhou S, OConnell R, Chong T, Bellgrove M, Coxon J bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39975060 PMC: 11838566. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.05.636628.

Parsing the heterogeneity of brain structure and function in male children with autism spectrum disorder: a multimodal MRI study.

Gao L, Qiao S, Zhang Y, Zhang T, Lu H, Guo X Brain Imaging Behav. 2025; .

PMID: 39966244 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-025-00978-y.

References

Mayer A, Dorflinger J, Rao S, Seidenberg M . Neural networks underlying endogenous and exogenous visual-spatial orienting. Neuroimage. 2004; 23(2):534-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.027. View

Maruishi M, Miyatani M, Nakao T, Muranaka H . Compensatory cortical activation during performance of an attention task by patients with diffuse axonal injury: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006; 78(2):168-73. PMC: 2077668. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.097345. View

Pessoa L, Kastner S, Ungerleider L . Attentional control of the processing of neural and emotional stimuli. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002; 15(1):31-45. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00214-8. View

Corbetta M, Kincade J, Ollinger J, McAvoy M, Shulman G . Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2000; 3(3):292-7. DOI: 10.1038/73009. View

Birn R, Smith M, Jones T, Bandettini P . The respiration response function: the temporal dynamics of fMRI signal fluctuations related to changes in respiration. Neuroimage. 2008; 40(2):644-654. PMC: 2533266. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.059. View

Mostofsky S, Schafer J, Abrams M, Goldberg M, Flower A, Boyce A . fMRI evidence that the neural basis of response inhibition is task-dependent. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003; 17(2):419-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00144-7. View

Chica A, Bartolomeo P, Lupianez J . Two cognitive and neural systems for endogenous and exogenous spatial attention. Behav Brain Res. 2012; 237:107-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.09.027. View

Shulman G, Ollinger J, Akbudak E, Conturo T, Snyder A, Petersen S . Areas involved in encoding and applying directional expectations to moving objects. J Neurosci. 1999; 19(21):9480-96. PMC: 6782891. View

Richiardi J, Gschwind M, Simioni S, Annoni J, Greco B, Hagmann P . Classifying minimally disabled multiple sclerosis patients from resting state functional connectivity. Neuroimage. 2012; 62(3):2021-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.078. View

10.

Jones T, Bandettini P, Birn R . Integration of motion correction and physiological noise regression in fMRI. Neuroimage. 2008; 42(2):582-90. PMC: 2833099. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.019. View

11.

Brainard D . The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis. 1997; 10(4):433-6. View

12.

Muller H, Rabbitt P . Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989; 15(2):315-30. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.15.2.315. View

13.

Hahn B, Ross T, Stein E . Neuroanatomical dissociation between bottom-up and top-down processes of visuospatial selective attention. Neuroimage. 2006; 32(2):842-53. PMC: 2652125. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.177. View

14.

Hopfinger J, Buonocore M, Mangun G . The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control. Nat Neurosci. 2000; 3(3):284-91. DOI: 10.1038/72999. View

15.

Fischl B, Salat D, Busa E, Albert M, Dieterich M, Haselgrove C . Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron. 2002; 33(3):341-55. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00569-x. View

16.

Weissman D, Prado J . Heightened activity in a key region of the ventral attention network is linked to reduced activity in a key region of the dorsal attention network during unexpected shifts of covert visual spatial attention. Neuroimage. 2012; 61(4):798-804. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.032. View

17.

Garavan H, Ross T, Stein E . Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96(14):8301-6. PMC: 22229. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.14.8301. View

18.

DeSimone R, Duncan J . Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995; 18:193-222. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205. View

19.

Chang C, Glover G . Relationship between respiration, end-tidal CO2, and BOLD signals in resting-state fMRI. Neuroimage. 2009; 47(4):1381-93. PMC: 2721281. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.048. View

20.

Kastner S, Pinsk M, De Weerd P, DeSimone R, Ungerleider L . Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuron. 1999; 22(4):751-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80734-5. View