» Articles » PMID: 39975060

The Role of Human Intraparietal Sulcus in Evidence Accumulation Revealed by EEG and Model-informed FMRI: IPS Accumulates Evidence During Decision-making

Overview
Journal bioRxiv
Date 2025 Feb 20
PMID 39975060
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sequential sampling models propose that the repeated sampling of sensory information is a fundamental component of perceptual decision-making. Electroencephalographic investigations in humans have demonstrated motor-independent representations of evidence accumulation, but such observations have seldom been made in neuroimaging studies exploring the neuroanatomical origins of evidence accumulation. Here, we aimed to reveal the neuroanatomical locus of sensory evidence accumulation in the human brain by regressing an electrophysiological marker of evidence accumulation (centroparietal positivity, CPP) against changes in blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal during perceptual decision-making. Our cross-modal imaging approach revealed a cluster within left intraparietal sulcus (IPS), located within putative lateral intraparietal area (region hIP3), for which BOLD signals scaled in relation to the slope of the CPP. Furthermore, the drift rate parameter of a drift diffusion model parametrically modulated BOLD activity within an overlapping region of left IPS. In contrast, parametric modulation by reaction time revealed a distributed fronto-parietal network, demonstrating the utility of our approach for isolating a discrete neuroanatomical locus of evidence accumulation. Together, our findings provide strong support for intraparietal sulcus involvement in the accumulation of sensory evidence during human perceptual decision-making.

References
1.
Dmochowski J, Norcia A . Cortical Components of Reaction-Time during Perceptual Decisions in Humans. PLoS One. 2015; 10(11):e0143339. PMC: 4658144. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143339. View

2.
Failing M, Theeuwes J . More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture. Psychon Bull Rev. 2019; 27(1):86-95. PMC: 7000503. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01672-z. View

3.
Ruge H, Goschke T, Braver T . Separating event-related BOLD components within trials: the partial-trial design revisited. Neuroimage. 2009; 47(2):501-13. PMC: 2791061. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.075. View

4.
Ho T, Brown S, Serences J . Domain general mechanisms of perceptual decision making in human cortex. J Neurosci. 2009; 29(27):8675-87. PMC: 2719543. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5984-08.2009. View

5.
Vossel S, Geng J, Fink G . Dorsal and ventral attention systems: distinct neural circuits but collaborative roles. Neuroscientist. 2013; 20(2):150-9. PMC: 4107817. DOI: 10.1177/1073858413494269. View