» Articles » PMID: 25753250

Psychosocial Perspectives on Sexual Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment

Overview
Journal Nat Rev Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2015 Mar 11
PMID 25753250
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many therapies for erectile dysfunction (ED) after prostate cancer treatment improve erectile firmness, yet, most couples stop using aids within 1-2 years. Patients and partners who expect immediate and complete success with their first ED treatment can be demoralized when they experience treatment failure, which contributes to reticence to explore other ED aids. Comprehensive patient education should improve sustainability and satisfaction with ED treatments. Pre-emptive and realistic information should be provided to couples about the probability of recovering natural erections. Beginning intervention early and using a couple-based approach is ideal. Recommendations are provided about the timing of ED treatment, the order of aid introduction, and combination therapies. Renegotiation of sexual activity is an essential part of sexual adaptation. From the outset of therapy, couples should be encouraged to broaden their sexual repertoire, incorporate erection-independent sexual activities, and continue to be sexual despite ED and reduced libido.

Citing Articles

Changes in Relationship Dynamics in Men and Women After Receiving the Diagnosis of Breast Versus Prostate Cancer: A Population-based Study.

Heath F, Ockerman K, Wiesemann G, Safeek R, Heath M, Momeni A Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025; 13(2):e6494.

PMID: 39989894 PMC: 11845180. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006494.


Patient Reported Sexual Adaptation Following Prostate Cancer Treatment: An Analysis of Related Variables and Sexual Outcomes Associated with Sexual Adaptation Styles.

Shah F, MacLeod F, Walker L Arch Sex Behav. 2024; 53(6):2377-2395.

PMID: 38609584 DOI: 10.1007/s10508-024-02855-z.


Sexual satisfaction in prostate cancer: a multi-group comparison study of treated patients, patients under active surveillance, patients with negative biopsy, and controls.

Walker L, Santos-Iglesias P J Cancer Surviv. 2023; 18(6):1790-1798.

PMID: 37365387 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01420-2.


Sexual health and treatment-related sexual dysfunction in sexual and gender minorities with prostate cancer.

Dickstein D, Edwards C, Lehrer E, Tarras E, Gallitto M, Sfakianos J Nat Rev Urol. 2023; 20(6):332-355.

PMID: 37217695 PMC: 10389287. DOI: 10.1038/s41585-023-00778-3.


Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures into health care for men with localized prostate cancer.

Singhal U, Skolarus T, Gore J, Parry M, Chen R, Nossiter J Nat Rev Urol. 2022; 19(5):263-279.

PMID: 35260844 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00575-4.


References
1.
Crowe H, Costello A . Prostate cancer: perspectives on quality of life and impact of treatment on patients and their partners. Urol Nurs. 2003; 23(4):279-85. View

2.
Montorsi F, Brock G, Lee J, Shapiro J, van Poppel H, Graefen M . Effect of nightly versus on-demand vardenafil on recovery of erectile function in men following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2008; 54(4):924-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.083. View

3.
Powel L, Clark J . The value of the marginalia as an adjunct to structured questionnaires: experiences of men after prostate cancer surgery. Qual Life Res. 2005; 14(3):827-35. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-004-0797-8. View

4.
Silver J, Baima J . Cancer prehabilitation: an opportunity to decrease treatment-related morbidity, increase cancer treatment options, and improve physical and psychological health outcomes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 92(8):715-27. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31829b4afe. View

5.
Chisholm K, McCabe M, Wootten A, Abbott J . Review: psychosocial interventions addressing sexual or relationship functioning in men with prostate cancer. J Sex Med. 2012; 9(5):1246-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02687.x. View