» Articles » PMID: 33128596

Role of Prehabilitation Following Major Uro-oncologic Surgery: a Narrative Review

Overview
Journal World J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2020 Oct 31
PMID 33128596
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Functional status and physical independence play a key role in terms of quality of life, access to treatment, and continuity of care. Surgery, a central component of cancer treatments, leads to detrimental effects on functional capacity, which can be peculiarly relevant in vulnerable patients undergoing major procedures. Prehabilitation is a multidisciplinary intervention that uses the preoperative period to prevent or attenuate treatment-related functional decline and its subsequent consequences. This paper narratively reviews the rationale and the evidence of prehabilitation for uro-oncologic surgery.

Methods: A narrative review was conducted in August 2020, aiming to: (1) identify and discuss the impact of modifiable determinants of postoperative outcomes in urology and (2) review randomized controlled trials (RCT) exploring the role of preoperative exercise, nutrition, and psychological interventions in uro-oncologic surgery.

Results: Eight RCTs on preoperative conditioning interventions met the inclusion criteria, focusing on radical cystectomy for bladder cancer (RC) and radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (RP). There is strong evidence that poor physical, nutritional and psychosocial status negatively impacts on surgical outcomes. Single modality interventions, such as preoperative exercise or nutrition alone, had no effect on 'traditional' surgical outcomes as length of stay or complication. However, multimodal approaches targeting postoperative functional status have shown to be effective and safe.

Conclusion: There is initial evidence on the effectiveness and safety of multimodal prehabilitation in preserving functional capacity following RC and RP. However, to date, outcomes such as complications and length of stay seem to be not affected by prehabilitation.

Citing Articles

Personalized Mobile App-Based Program for Preparation and Recovery After Radical Prostatectomy: Initial Evidence for Improved Outcomes From a Prospective Nonrandomized Study.

Martini A, Kesch C, Touzani A, Calleris G, Buhas B, Abou-Zahr R J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e55429.

PMID: 39671590 PMC: 11681284. DOI: 10.2196/55429.


Detailed description of multidisciplinary prehabilitation in patients admitted to nerve sparring radical prostatectomy - A randomized feasibility study protocol.

Pedersen M, Saxton J, Villumsen B, Jensen J, Birch S Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024; 40:101319.

PMID: 38947984 PMC: 11211855. DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101319.


[Prehabilitation prior to radical prostatectomy : A useful concept?].

Butea-Bocu M, Beyer B, Muller G Urologie. 2023; 62(10):1041-1047.

PMID: 37620505 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-023-02173-7.


[Exercise therapy in prehabilitation : Current findings in urology].

Mendes Wefelnberg M, Reimer N, Baumann F Urologie. 2023; 62(10):1011-1016.

PMID: 37606656 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-023-02171-9.


Comment on "Role of prehabilitation following major uro‑oncologic surgery: a narrative review".

Beilstein C, Wuethrich P, Furrer M, Engel D World J Urol. 2022; 40(11):2825-2826.

PMID: 36048233 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04140-x.


References
1.
Gandaglia G, Varda B, Sood A, Pucheril D, Konijeti R, Sammon J . Short-term perioperative outcomes of patients treated with radical cystectomy for bladder cancer included in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Can Urol Assoc J. 2014; 8(9-10):E681-7. PMC: 4216299. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.2069. View

2.
Trama A, Foschi R, Larranaga N, Sant M, Fuentes-Raspall R, Serraino D . Survival of male genital cancers (prostate, testis and penis) in Europe 1999-2007: Results from the EUROCARE-5 study. Eur J Cancer. 2015; 51(15):2206-2216. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.027. View

3.
Siegel R, Miller K, Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016; 66(1):7-30. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21332. View

4.
Geraerts I, van Poppel H, Devoogdt N, Laenen A, De Groef A, Van Kampen M . Progression and predictors of physical activity levels after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2013; 114(2):185-92. DOI: 10.1111/bju.12465. View

5.
Sanda M, Dunn R, Michalski J, Sandler H, Northouse L, Hembroff L . Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(12):1250-61. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa074311. View