» Articles » PMID: 25745633

Developing and Selecting Auditory Warnings for a Real-Time Behavioral Intervention

Overview
Date 2015 Mar 7
PMID 25745633
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Real-time sensing and computing technologies are increasingly used in the delivery of real-time health behavior interventions. Auditory signals play a critical role in many of these interventions, impacting not only behavioral response but also treatment adherence and participant retention. Yet, few behavioral interventions that employ auditory feedback report the characteristics of sounds used and even fewer design signals specifically for their intervention. This paper describes a four-step process used in developing and selecting auditory warnings for a behavioral trial designed to reduce indoor secondhand smoke exposure. In step one, relevant information was gathered from ergonomic and behavioral science literature to assist a panel of research assistants in developing criteria for intervention-specific auditory feedback. In step two, multiple sounds were identified through internet searches and modified in accordance with the developed criteria, and two sounds were selected that best met those criteria. In step three, a survey was conducted among 64 persons from the primary sampling frame of the larger behavioral trial to compare the relative aversiveness of sounds, determine respondents' reported behavioral reactions to those signals, and assess participant's preference between sounds. In the final step, survey results were used to select the appropriate sound for auditory warnings. Ultimately, a single-tone pulse, 500 milliseconds (ms) in length that repeats every 270 ms for 3 cycles was chosen for the behavioral trial. The methods described herein represent one example of steps that can be followed to develop and select auditory feedback tailored for a given behavioral intervention.

Citing Articles

Empirically validating a computational model of automatic behavior shaping.

Berardi V, Lan T, Guirguis A, Maoz U PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0313925.

PMID: 39820204 PMC: 11737743. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313925.


Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Methods for the Analysis of Real-Time Data: Exploring Peak Clustering in a Secondhand Smoke Exposure Intervention.

Berardi V, Carretero-Gonzalez R, Klepeis N, Palacios A, Bellettiere J, Hughes S J Comput Sci. 2023; 11:102-111.

PMID: 36776413 PMC: 9915335. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2015.10.006.


Assessing reinforcing versus aversive consequences in a real-time secondhand smoke intervention.

Berardi V, Bellettiere J, Nguyen B, Klepeis N, Hughes S, Adams M Transl Behav Med. 2021; 11(8):1558-1566.

PMID: 33823045 PMC: 8367017. DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab004.


Male Involvement in Family Planning Utilization and Associated Factors in Womberma District, Northern Ethiopia: Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Wondim G, Degu G, Teka Y, Diress G Open Access J Contracept. 2021; 11:197-207.

PMID: 33414646 PMC: 7781357. DOI: 10.2147/OAJC.S287159.


Randomised controlled trial of real-time feedback and brief coaching to reduce indoor smoking.

Hovell M, Bellettiere J, Liles S, Nguyen B, Berardi V, Johnson C Tob Control. 2019; 29(2):183-190.

PMID: 30770436 PMC: 6697236. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054717.


References
1.
Johnston J . Punishment of human behavior. Am Psychol. 1972; 27(11):1033-54. DOI: 10.1037/h0033887. View

2.
Edworthy J, Stanton N . A user-centred approach to the design and evaluation of auditory warning signals: 1. Methodology. Ergonomics. 1995; 38(11):2262-80. DOI: 10.1080/00140139508925267. View

3.
Edworthy J, Loxley S, Dennis I . Improving auditory warning design: relationship between warning sound parameters and perceived urgency. Hum Factors. 1991; 33(2):205-31. DOI: 10.1177/001872089103300206. View

4.
Rovniak L, Hovell M, Wojcik J, Winett R, Martinez-Donate A . Enhancing theoretical fidelity: an e-mail-based walking program demonstration. Am J Health Promot. 2005; 20(2):85-95. DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-20.2.85. View

5.
Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Christensen B . Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2005; 55(513):305-12. PMC: 1463134. View