Motivational Interviewing: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview

Journal Br J Gen Pract

Specialty Public Health

Date 2005 Apr 14

PMID 15826439

Citations 566

Authors

Sune Rubak

Annelli Sandbaek

Torsten Lauritzen

Bo Christensen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Motivational Interviewing is a well-known, scientifically tested method of counselling clients developed by Miller and Rollnick and viewed as a useful intervention strategy in the treatment of lifestyle problems and disease.

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of motivational interviewing in different areas of disease and to identify factors shaping outcomes.

Design Of Study: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials using motivational interviewing as the intervention.

Method: After selection criteria a systematic literature search in 16 databases produced 72 randomised controlled trials the first of which was published in 1991. A quality assessment was made with a validated scale. A meta-analysis was performed as a generic inverse variance meta-analysis.

Results: Meta-analysis showed a significant effect (95% confidence interval) for motivational interviewing for combined effect estimates for body mass index, total blood cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, blood alcohol concentration and standard ethanol content, while combined effect estimates for cigarettes per day and for HbA(1c) were not significant. Motivational interviewing had a significant and clinically relevant effect in approximately three out of four studies, with an equal effect on physiological (72%) and psychological (75%) diseases. Psychologists and physicians obtained an effect in approximately 80% of the studies, while other healthcare providers obtained an effect in 46% of the studies. When using motivational interviewing in brief encounters of 15 minutes, 64% of the studies showed an effect. More than one encounter with the patient ensures the effectiveness of motivational interviewing.

Conclusion: Motivational interviewing in a scientific setting outperforms traditional advice giving in the treatment of a broad range of behavioural problems and diseases. Large-scale studies are now needed to prove that motivational interviewing can be implemented into daily clinical work in primary and secondary health care.

Citing Articles

Micro-gyms as a catalyst for healthy aging in university and healthcare settings: applications for the Semmelweis-EUniWell Workplace Health Promotion Model Program.

Mozes N, Arva D, Major D, Fekete M, Dosa N, Lehoczki A Geroscience. 2025; .

PMID: 40088392 DOI: 10.1007/s11357-025-01595-9.

Implementing motivational interviewing to improve endocrine therapy adherence among breast cancer patients: a qualitative process evaluation of the getset pilot intervention.

Dunsmore V, Ellis C, Drier S, Waters A, Fray N, Stylianou C Cancer Causes Control. 2025; .

PMID: 39979769 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-025-01971-y.

Changing Our Mental and Emotional Trajectory (COMET): The Feasibility and Acceptability of a Rural Community-Based Strategy to Prevent Mental and Emotional Health Problems.

Zittleman L, Felzien M, Curcija K, Bennett C, Bennett K, Carrica 3rd J J Prim Care Community Health. 2025; 16:21501319251317337.

PMID: 39907546 PMC: 11800243. DOI: 10.1177/21501319251317337.

Co-Designing a Digital Brief Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Prescription Opioid-Related Harm Among People With Chronic Noncancer Pain: Qualitative Analysis of Patient Lived Experiences.

Elphinston R, Pager S, Brown K, Sterling M, Fatehi F, Gray P JMIR Form Res. 2025; 9:e57208.

PMID: 39883931 PMC: 11826952. DOI: 10.2196/57208.

Investigating assumptions in motivational interviewing among general practitioners: a qualitative study.

Aujoulat P, Manach A, Le Reste C, Le Goff D, Le Reste J, Barais M BMC Prim Care. 2025; 26(1):15.

PMID: 39833675 PMC: 11744887. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-025-02706-3.

References

Sellman J, Sullivan P, Dore G, Adamson S, MacEwan I . A randomized controlled trial of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) for mild to moderate alcohol dependence. J Stud Alcohol. 2001; 62(3):389-96. DOI: 10.15288/jsa.2001.62.389. View

Monti P, Colby S, Barnett N, Spirito A, Rohsenow D, Myers M . Brief intervention for harm reduction with alcohol-positive older adolescents in a hospital emergency department. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999; 67(6):989-94. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.67.6.989. View

Walters S, Bennett M, Miller J . Reducing alcohol use in college students: a controlled trial of two brief interventions. J Drug Educ. 2000; 30(3):361-72. DOI: 10.2190/JHML-0JPD-YE7L-14CT. View

Pill R, STOTT N, Rollnick S, Rees M . A randomized controlled trial of an intervention designed to improve the care given in general practice to Type II diabetic patients: patient outcomes and professional ability to change behaviour. Fam Pract. 1998; 15(3):229-35. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/15.3.229. View

Stotts A, DiClemente C, Dolan-Mullen P . One-to-one: a motivational intervention for resistant pregnant smokers. Addict Behav. 2002; 27(2):275-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4603(01)00174-5. View

Longshore D, Grills C, Annon K . Effects of a culturally congruent intervention on cognitive factors related to drug-use recovery. Subst Use Misuse. 1999; 34(9):1223-41. DOI: 10.3109/10826089909039406. View

Ershoff D, QUINN V, Boyd N, Stern J, Gregory M, Wirtschafter D . The Kaiser Permanente prenatal smoking-cessation trial: when more isn't better, what is enough?. Am J Prev Med. 2000; 17(3):161-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00071-9. View

Rollnick S, Butler C, Stott N . Helping smokers make decisions: the enhancement of brief intervention for general medical practice. Patient Educ Couns. 1997; 31(3):191-203. DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(97)01004-5. View

Baker A, Boggs T, Lewin T . Randomized controlled trial of brief cognitive-behavioural interventions among regular users of amphetamine. Addiction. 2001; 96(9):1279-87. DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96912797.x. View

10.

Ockene J, Kristeller J, Pbert L, Hebert J, Luippold R, Goldberg R . The physician-delivered smoking intervention project: can short-term interventions produce long-term effects for a general outpatient population?. Health Psychol. 1994; 13(3):278-81. DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.13.3.278. View

11.

Baker A, Kochan N, DIXON J, Heather N, Wodak A . Controlled evaluation of a brief intervention for HIV prevention among injecting drug users not in treatment. AIDS Care. 1994; 6(5):559-70. DOI: 10.1080/09540129408258670. View

12.

Baker A, Heather N, Wodak A, DIXON J, Holt P . Evaluation of a cognitive-behavioural intervention for HIV prevention among injecting drug users. AIDS. 1993; 7(2):247-56. DOI: 10.1097/00002030-199302000-00014. View

13.

Fleming M, Barry K, Manwell L, Johnson K, London R . Brief physician advice for problem alcohol drinkers. A randomized controlled trial in community-based primary care practices. JAMA. 1997; 277(13):1039-45. View

14.

Fleming M, Mundt M, French M, Baier Manwell L, Stauffacher E, Barry K . Brief physician advice for problem drinkers: long-term efficacy and benefit-cost analysis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002; 26(1):36-43. View

15.

Emmons K, Hammond S, Fava J, Velicer W, Evans J, Monroe A . A randomized trial to reduce passive smoke exposure in low-income households with young children. Pediatrics. 2001; 108(1):18-24. DOI: 10.1542/peds.108.1.18. View

16.

Harland J, White M, Drinkwater C, Chinn D, Farr L, Howel D . The Newcastle exercise project: a randomised controlled trial of methods to promote physical activity in primary care. BMJ. 1999; 319(7213):828-32. PMC: 314213. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7213.828. View

17.

Stephens R, Roffman R, Curtin L . Comparison of extended versus brief treatments for marijuana use. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000; 68(5):898-908. View

18.

Jadad A, Moore R, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds D, Gavaghan D . Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Control Clin Trials. 1996; 17(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4. View

19.

Kemp R, Kirov G, Everitt B, Hayward P, David A . Randomised controlled trial of compliance therapy. 18-month follow-up. Br J Psychiatry. 1998; 172:413-9. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.172.5.413. View

20.

Tappin D, Lumsden M, McIntyre D, Mckay C, Gilmour W, Webber R . A pilot study to establish a randomized trial methodology to test the efficacy of a behavioural intervention. Health Educ Res. 2000; 15(4):491-502. DOI: 10.1093/her/15.4.491. View