» Articles » PMID: 25738477

Heat Sink Effect on Tumor Ablation Characteristics As Observed in Monopolar Radiofrequency, Bipolar Radiofrequency, and Microwave, Using Ex Vivo Calf Liver Model

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2015 Mar 5
PMID 25738477
Citations 76
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Thermal ablation of liver tumors near large blood vessels is affected by the cooling effect of blood flow, leading to incomplete ablation. Hence, we conducted a comparative investigation of heat sink effect in monopolar (MP) and bipolar (BP) radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and microwave (MW) ablation devices.With a perfused calf liver, the ablative performances (volume, mass, density, dimensions), with and without heat sink, were measured. Heat sink was present when the ablative tip of the probes were 8.0 mm close to a major hepatic vein and absent when >30 mm away. Temperatures (T1 and T2) on either side of the hepatic vein near the tip of the probes, heating probe temperature (T3), outlet perfusate temperature (T4), and ablation time were monitored.With or without heat sink, BP radiofrequency ablated a larger volume and mass, compared with MP RFA or MW ablation, with latter device producing the highest density of tissue ablated. MW ablation produced an ellipsoidal shape while radiofrequency devices produced spheres.Percentage heat sink effect in Bipolar radiofrequency : Mono-polar radiofrequency : Microwave was (Volume) 33:41:22; (mass) 23:56:34; (density) 9.0:26:18; and (relative elipscity) 5.8:12.9:1.3, indicating that BP and MW devices were less affected.Percentage heat sink effect on time (minutes) to reach maximum temperature (W) = 13.28:9.2:29.8; time at maximum temperature (X) is 87:66:16.66; temperature difference (Y) between the thermal probes (T3) and the temperature (T1 + T2)/2 on either side of the hepatic vessel was 100:87:20; and temperature difference between the (T1 + T2)/2 and temperature of outlet circulating solution (T4), Z was 20.33:30.23:37.5.MW and BP radiofrequencies were less affected by heat sink while MP RFA was the most affected. With a single ablation, BP radiofrequency ablated a larger volume and mass regardless of heat sink.

Citing Articles

Current Treatment Paradigm and Approach to Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Patresan J, Patel H, Chandrasekaran K, Reynolds G Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e75471.

PMID: 39791050 PMC: 11717138. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75471.


Stereotactic Percutaneous Electrochemotherapy as a New Minimal Invasive Treatment Modality for Primary and Secondary Liver Malignancies.

Luerken L, Goetz A, Mayr V, Zhang L, Schlitt A, Haimerl M Biomedicines. 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39767776 PMC: 11673152. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12122870.


Pulsed electric field ablation as a candidate to enhance the anti-tumor immune response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Arciga B, Walters D, Kimchi E, Staveley-OCarroll K, Li G, Teixeiro E Cancer Lett. 2024; 609:217361.

PMID: 39608443 PMC: 11625606. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.217361.


Prospects of Synergy: Local Interventions and CAR T Cell Therapy in Solid Tumors.

Holtermann A, Gislon M, Angele M, Subklewe M, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Lauber K BioDrugs. 2024; 38(5):611-637.

PMID: 39080180 PMC: 11358237. DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00669-y.


Conventional versus Hepatic Arteriography and C-Arm CT-Guided Ablation of Liver Tumors (HepACAGA): A Comparative Analysis.

Wijnen N, Bruijnen R, Vonken E, W A M de Jong H, de Bruijne J, Bol G Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(10).

PMID: 38792003 PMC: 11119442. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101925.


References
1.
Shehada R, Mansour H, Grundfest W . Laser tissue interaction in direct myocardial revascularization. Semin Interv Cardiol. 2000; 5(2):63-70. DOI: 10.1006/siic.2000.0123. View

2.
Foster K, Schwan H . Dielectric properties of tissues and biological materials: a critical review. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1989; 17(1):25-104. View

3.
Alemi F, Kwon E, Chiu J, Aoki H, Stewart L, Corvera C . Laparoscopic treatment of liver tumours using a two-needle probe bipolar radiofrequency ablation device. HPB (Oxford). 2011; 13(9):656-64. PMC: 3183451. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00347.x. View

4.
Andreano A, Brace C . A comparison of direct heating during radiofrequency and microwave ablation in ex vivo liver. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012; 36(2):505-11. PMC: 3437379. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-012-0405-1. View

5.
Washburn W, Dodd 3rd G, Kohlmeier R, McCoy V, Napier D, Hubbard L . Radiofrequency tissue ablation: effect of hepatic blood flow occlusion on thermal injuries produced in cirrhotic livers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003; 10(7):773-7. DOI: 10.1245/aso.2003.09.013. View