» Articles » PMID: 25733013

Robust Skull-Stripping Segmentation Based on Irrational Mask for Magnetic Resonance Brain Images

Overview
Journal J Digit Imaging
Publisher Springer
Date 2015 Mar 4
PMID 25733013
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper proposes a new method for simple, efficient, and robust removal of the non-brain tissues in MR images based on an irrational mask for filtration within a binary morphological operation framework. The proposed skull-stripping segmentation is based on two irrational 3 × 3 and 5 × 5 masks, having the sum of its weights equal to the transcendental number π value provided by the Gregory-Leibniz infinite series. It allows maintaining a lower rate of useful pixel loss. The proposed method has been tested in two ways. First, it has been validated as a binary method by comparing and contrasting with Otsu's, Sauvola's, Niblack's, and Bernsen's binary methods. Secondly, its accuracy has been verified against three state-of-the-art skull-stripping methods: the graph cuts method, the method based on Chan-Vese active contour model, and the simplex mesh and histogram analysis skull stripping. The performance of the proposed method has been assessed using the Dice scores, overlap and extra fractions, and sensitivity and specificity as statistical methods. The gold standard has been provided by two neurologist experts. The proposed method has been tested and validated on 26 image series which contain 216 images from two publicly available databases: the Whole Brain Atlas and the Internet Brain Segmentation Repository that include a highly variable sample population (with reference to age, sex, healthy/diseased). The approach performs accurately on both standardized databases. The main advantage of the proposed method is its robustness and speed.

Citing Articles

AFEX-Net: Adaptive feature extraction convolutional neural network for classifying computerized tomography images.

Zahedi Nasab R, Mohseni H, Montazeri M, Ghasemian F, Amin S Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241232882.

PMID: 38406769 PMC: 10894540. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241232882.


Automated, fast, robust brain extraction on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI in presence of brain tumors: an optimized model based on multi-center datasets.

Teng Y, Chen C, Shu X, Zhao F, Zhang L, Xu J Eur Radiol. 2023; 34(2):1190-1199.

PMID: 37615767 PMC: 10853304. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10078-4.


Deep Learning-Based Post-Processing of Real-Time MRI to Assess and Quantify Dynamic Wrist Movement in Health and Disease.

Radke K, Wollschlager L, Nebelung S, Abrar D, Schleich C, Boschheidgen M Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(6).

PMID: 34208361 PMC: 8231139. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11061077.


Gaussian mixture model for texture characterization with application to brain DTI images.

Moraru L, Moldovanu S, Dimitrievici L, Dey N, Ashour A, Shi F J Adv Res. 2019; 16:15-23.

PMID: 30899585 PMC: 6413310. DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2019.01.001.

References
1.
Vijayakumar C, Gharpure D . Development of image-processing software for automatic segmentation of brain tumors in MR images. J Med Phys. 2011; 36(3):147-58. PMC: 3159221. DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.83481. View

2.
Punga M, Gaurav R, Moraru L . Level set method coupled with Energy Image features for brain MR image segmentation. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2014; 59(3):219-29. DOI: 10.1515/bmt-2013-0111. View

3.
Galdames F, Jaillet F, Perez C . An accurate skull stripping method based on simplex meshes and histogram analysis for magnetic resonance images. J Neurosci Methods. 2012; 206(2):103-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.02.017. View

4.
Shattuck D, Schaper K, Rottenberg D, Leahy R . Magnetic resonance image tissue classification using a partial volume model. Neuroimage. 2001; 13(5):856-76. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0730. View

5.
Doshi J, Erus G, Ou Y, Gaonkar B, Davatzikos C . Multi-atlas skull-stripping. Acad Radiol. 2013; 20(12):1566-76. PMC: 3880117. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.09.010. View