» Articles » PMID: 14697002

Automatic Brain Tumor Segmentation by Subject Specific Modification of Atlas Priors

Overview
Journal Acad Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2003 Dec 31
PMID 14697002
Citations 68
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale And Objectives: Manual segmentation of brain tumors from magnetic resonance images is a challenging and time-consuming task. An automated system has been developed for brain tumor segmentation that will provide objective, reproducible segmentations that are close to the manual results. Additionally, the method segments white matter, grey matter, cerebrospinal fluid, and edema. The segmentation of pathology and healthy structures is crucial for surgical planning and intervention.

Materials And Methods: The method performs the segmentation of a registered set of magnetic resonance images using an expectation-maximization scheme. The segmentation is guided by a spatial probabilistic atlas that contains expert prior knowledge about brain structures. This atlas is modified with the subject-specific brain tumor prior that is computed based on contrast enhancement.

Results: Five cases with different types of tumors are selected for evaluation. The results obtained from the automatic segmentation program are compared with results from manual and semi-automated methods. The automated method yields results that have surface distances at roughly 1-4 mm compared with the manual results.

Conclusion: The automated method can be applied to different types of tumors. Although its performance is below that of the semi-automated method, it has the advantage of requiring no user supervision.

Citing Articles

A next-generation, histological atlas of the human brain and its application to automated brain MRI segmentation.

Casamitjana A, Mancini M, Robinson E, Peter L, Annunziata R, Althonayan J bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39282320 PMC: 11398399. DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.05.579016.


Performance Improvement in Brain Tumor Detection in MRI Images Using a Combination of Evolutionary Algorithms and Active Contour Method.

Saeidifar M, Yazdi M, Zolghadrasli A J Digit Imaging. 2021; 34(5):1209-1224.

PMID: 34561783 PMC: 8554933. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-021-00514-6.


MRI-Based Brain Tumor Classification Using Ensemble of Deep Features and Machine Learning Classifiers.

Kang J, Ullah Z, Gwak J Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(6).

PMID: 33810176 PMC: 8004778. DOI: 10.3390/s21062222.


Quantitative definition of neurobehavior, vision, hearing and brain volumes in macaques congenitally exposed to Zika virus.

Koenig M, Razo E, Mitzey A, Newman C, Dudley D, Breitbach M PLoS One. 2020; 15(10):e0235877.

PMID: 33091010 PMC: 7580995. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235877.


BraTS Toolkit: Translating BraTS Brain Tumor Segmentation Algorithms Into Clinical and Scientific Practice.

Kofler F, Berger C, Waldmannstetter D, Lipkova J, Ezhov I, Tetteh G Front Neurosci. 2020; 14:125.

PMID: 32410929 PMC: 7201293. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00125.


References
1.
Warfield S, Dengler J, Zaers J, Guttmann C, Wells 3rd W, Ettinger G . Automatic identification of gray matter structures from MRI to improve the segmentation of white matter lesions. J Image Guid Surg. 1995; 1(6):326-38. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-712X(1995)1:6<326::AID-IGS4>3.0.CO;2-C. View

2.
Vinitski S, Gonzalez C, Mohamed F, Iwanaga T, Knobler R, Khalili K . Improved intracranial lesion characterization by tissue segmentation based on a 3D feature map. Magn Reson Med. 1997; 37(3):457-69. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910370325. View

3.
Wells W, Grimson W, Kikinis R, Jolesz F . Adaptive segmentation of MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1996; 15(4):429-42. DOI: 10.1109/42.511747. View

4.
Van Leemput K, Maes F, Vandermeulen D, Colchester A, Suetens P . Automated segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions by model outlier detection. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001; 20(8):677-88. DOI: 10.1109/42.938237. View

5.
Velthuizen R, Clarke L, Phuphanich S, Hall L, Bensaid A, Arrington J . Unsupervised measurement of brain tumor volume on MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1995; 5(5):594-605. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880050520. View