» Articles » PMID: 25723187

In-vivo Assessment of Femoral Bone Strength Using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Based on Routine MDCT Imaging: a Preliminary Study on Patients with Vertebral Fractures

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Feb 28
PMID 25723187
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To experimentally validate a non-linear finite element analysis (FEA) modeling approach assessing in-vitro fracture risk at the proximal femur and to transfer the method to standard in-vivo multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) data of the hip aiming to predict additional hip fracture risk in subjects with and without osteoporosis associated vertebral fractures using bone mineral density (BMD) measurements as gold standard.

Methods: One fresh-frozen human femur specimen was mechanically tested and fractured simulating stance and clinically relevant fall loading configurations to the hip. After experimental in-vitro validation, the FEA simulation protocol was transferred to standard contrast-enhanced in-vivo MDCT images to calculate individual hip fracture risk each for 4 subjects with and without a history of osteoporotic vertebral fractures matched by age and gender. In addition, FEA based risk factor calculations were compared to manual femoral BMD measurements of all subjects.

Results: In-vitro simulations showed good correlation with the experimentally measured strains both in stance (R2 = 0.963) and fall configuration (R2 = 0.976). The simulated maximum stress overestimated the experimental failure load (4743 N) by 14.7% (5440 N) while the simulated maximum strain overestimated by 4.7% (4968 N). The simulated failed elements coincided precisely with the experimentally determined fracture locations. BMD measurements in subjects with a history of osteoporotic vertebral fractures did not differ significantly from subjects without fragility fractures (femoral head: p = 0.989; femoral neck: p = 0.366), but showed higher FEA based risk factors for additional incident hip fractures (p = 0.028).

Conclusion: FEA simulations were successfully validated by elastic and destructive in-vitro experiments. In the subsequent in-vivo analyses, MDCT based FEA based risk factor differences for additional hip fractures were not mirrored by according BMD measurements. Our data suggests, that MDCT derived FEA models may assess bone strength more accurately than BMD measurements alone, providing a valuable in-vivo fracture risk assessment tool.

Citing Articles

Finite element modeling of clavicle fracture fixations: a systematic scoping review.

Zheng Y, Li J, Tam A, Lee T, Peng Y, Cheung J Med Biol Eng Comput. 2025; .

PMID: 39873960 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-025-03294-1.


CT image-based biomarkers for opportunistic screening of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Praveen A, Sollmann N, Baum T, Ferguson S, Benedikt H Osteoporos Int. 2024; 35(6):971-996.

PMID: 38353706 PMC: 11136833. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07029-0.


Computed Tomography-Based Stiffness Measures of Trabecular Bone Microstructure: Cadaveric Validation and In Vivo Application.

Guha I, Zhang X, Rajapakse C, Letuchy E, Chang G, Janz K JBMR Plus. 2022; 6(6):e10627.

PMID: 35720662 PMC: 9189917. DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10627.


Documenting the Anisotropic Stiffness of Hard Tissues with Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy.

Cai X, Bernard S, Grimal Q Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022; 1364:279-295.

PMID: 35508880 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-91979-5_13.


Finite element analysis of trabecular bone microstructure using CT imaging and continuum mechanical modeling.

Guha I, Zhang X, Rajapakse C, Chang G, Saha P Med Phys. 2022; 49(6):3886-3899.

PMID: 35319784 PMC: 9325403. DOI: 10.1002/mp.15629.


References
1.
Bessho M, Ohnishi I, Matsumoto T, Ohashi S, Matsuyama J, Tobita K . Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions. Bone. 2009; 45(2):226-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.04.241. View

2.
Kazakia G, Hyun B, Burghardt A, Krug R, Newitt D, de Papp A . In vivo determination of bone structure in postmenopausal women: a comparison of HR-pQCT and high-field MR imaging. J Bone Miner Res. 2007; 23(4):463-74. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.071116. View

3.
Bliuc D, Nguyen N, Milch V, Nguyen T, Eisman J, Center J . Mortality risk associated with low-trauma osteoporotic fracture and subsequent fracture in men and women. JAMA. 2009; 301(5):513-21. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.50. View

4.
McCreadie B, Goldstein S . Biomechanics of fracture: is bone mineral density sufficient to assess risk?. J Bone Miner Res. 2000; 15(12):2305-8. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.12.2305. View

5.
Gruber M, Bauer J, Dobritz M, Beer A, Wolf P, Woertler K . Bone mineral density measurements of the proximal femur from routine contrast-enhanced MDCT data sets correlate with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Eur Radiol. 2012; 23(2):505-12. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2629-5. View