» Articles » PMID: 25697993

Analysis of Tissue Changes, Measurement System Effects, and Motion Artifacts in Echo Decorrelation Imaging

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2015 Feb 21
PMID 25697993
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Echo decorrelation imaging, a method for mapping ablation-induced ultrasound echo changes, is analyzed. Local echo decorrelation is shown to approximate the decoherence spectrum of tissue reflectivity. Effects of the ultrasound measurement system, echo signal windowing, electronic noise, and tissue motion on echo decorrelation images are determined theoretically, leading to a method for reduction of motion and noise artifacts. Theoretical analysis is validated by simulations and experiments. Simulated decoherence of the scattering medium was recovered with root-mean-square error less than 10% with accuracy dependent on the correlation window size. Motion-induced decorrelation measured in an ex vivo pubovisceral muscle model showed similar trends to theoretical motion-induced decorrelation for a 2.1 MHz curvilinear array with decorrelation approaching unity for 3-4 mm elevational displacement or 1-1.6 mm range displacement. For in vivo imaging of porcine liver by a 7 MHz linear array, theoretical decorrelation computed using image-based motion estimates correlated significantly with measured decorrelation (r = 0.931, N = 10). Echo decorrelation artifacts incurred during in vivo radiofrequency ablation in the same porcine liver were effectively compensated based on the theoretical echo decorrelation model and measured pre-treatment decorrelation. These results demonstrate the potential of echo decorrelation imaging for quantification of heat-induced changes to the scattering tissue medium during thermal ablation.

Citing Articles

Retrospective evaluation of a novel ultrasound-based imaging analysis software for predicting radiofrequency ablation areas.

Sato M, Tateishi R, Zohar Y, Sato J, Watadani T, Moriyama M PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0317469.

PMID: 39823502 PMC: 11741625. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317469.


Three-dimensional echo decorrelation monitoring of radiofrequency ablation in ex vivo bovine liver.

Ghahramani Z E, Grimm P, Eary K, Swearengen M, Dayavansha E, Mast T J Acoust Soc Am. 2022; 151(6):3907.

PMID: 35778168 PMC: 9187351. DOI: 10.1121/10.0011641.


Numerical analysis of three-dimensional echo decorrelation imaging.

Cox M, Abbass M, Mast T J Acoust Soc Am. 2020; 147(6):EL478.

PMID: 32611173 PMC: 7275868. DOI: 10.1121/10.0001334.


In vivo ultrasound thermal ablation control using echo decorrelation imaging in rabbit liver and VX2 tumor.

Abbass M, Ahmad S, Mahalingam N, Krothapalli K, Masterson J, Rao M PLoS One. 2019; 14(12):e0226001.

PMID: 31805129 PMC: 6894854. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226001.


Monitoring Microwave Ablation Using Ultrasound Echo Decorrelation Imaging: An vivo Study.

Zhou Z, Wang Y, Song S, Wu W, Wu S, Tsui P Sensors (Basel). 2019; 19(4).

PMID: 30823609 PMC: 6412341. DOI: 10.3390/s19040977.


References
1.
Varghese T, Ophir J . Estimating tissue strain from signal decorrelation using the correlation coefficient. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1996; 22(9):1249-54. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(96)00166-4. View

2.
Mast T, Pucke D, Subramanian S, Bowlus W, Rudich S, Buell J . Ultrasound monitoring of in vitro radio frequency ablation by echo decorrelation imaging. J Ultrasound Med. 2008; 27(12):1685-97. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.12.1685. View

3.
Insana , Cook , Bilgen , Chaturvedi , Zhu . Maximum-likelihood approach to strain imaging using ultrasound. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000; 107(3):1421-34. PMC: 2724659. DOI: 10.1121/1.428429. View

4.
Li X, Ghoshal G, Lavarello R, Oelze M . Exploring potential mechanisms responsible for observed changes of ultrasonic backscattered energy with temperature variations. Med Phys. 2014; 41(5):052901. PMC: 4000386. DOI: 10.1118/1.4870964. View

5.
Cha C, Saif M, Yamane B, Weber S . Hepatocellular carcinoma: current management. Curr Probl Surg. 2009; 47(1):10-67. DOI: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2009.09.003. View