» Articles » PMID: 25697412

Effect of Reducing the Paediatric Stavudine Dose by Half: a Physiologically-based Pharmacokinetic Model

Overview
Date 2015 Feb 21
PMID 25697412
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Owing to significant dose-related toxicity, the adult stavudine dose was reduced in 2007. The paediatric dose, however, has not been reduced. Although the intended paediatric dose is 1 mg/kg twice daily (b.i.d.), the current weight-band dosing approach results in a mean actual dose of 1.23±0.47 mg/kg. Both efficacy and mitochondrial toxicity depend on the concentration of the intracellular metabolite stavudine triphosphate (d4T-TP). We simulated the effect of reducing the paediatric dose to 0.5 mg/kg. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model consisting of 13 tissue compartments plus a full ADAM model was used to describe the elimination of stavudine. The volume of distribution at steady-state and apparent oral clearance were simulated and the resulting AUC profile was compared with literature data in adult and paediatric populations. A biochemical reaction model was utilised to simulate intracellular d4T-TP levels for both the standard and proposed reduced paediatric doses. Simulated and observed exposure after oral dosing showed adequate agreement. Mean steady-state d4T-TP for 1.23 mg/kg b.i.d. was 27.9 (90% CI 27.0-28.9) fmol/10(6) cells, 25% higher than that achieved by the 40 mg adult dose. The 0.5 mg/kg dose resulted in d4T-TP of 13.2 (12.7-13.7) fmol/10(6) cells, slightly higher than the adult dose of 20 mg b.i.d. [11.5 (11.2-11.9) fmol/10(6) cells], which has excellent antiviral efficacy and substantially less toxicity. Current paediatric dosing may result in even higher d4T-TP than the original 40 mg adult dose. Halving the paediatric dose would significantly reduce the risk of mitochondrial toxicity without compromising antiviral efficacy.

Citing Articles

CNS Viral Infections-What to Consider for Improving Drug Treatment: A Plea for Using Mathematical Modeling Approaches.

Sun M, Manson M, Guo T, de Lange E CNS Drugs. 2024; 38(5):349-373.

PMID: 38580795 PMC: 11026214. DOI: 10.1007/s40263-024-01082-3.


Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Model of Gold Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery System for Stavudine Biodistribution.

Zazo H, Colino C, Gutierrez-Millan C, Cordero A, Bartneck M, Lanao J Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(2).

PMID: 35214138 PMC: 8875329. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14020406.


Physiologically-based pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone in pregnant women.

Biesdorf C, Martins F, Sy S, Diniz A Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019; 85(5):914-923.

PMID: 30669177 PMC: 6475689. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13872.


Application of antimicrobial drugs in perioperative surgical incision.

Yang X, Xiao X, Wang L, Ao Y, Song Y, Wang H Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2018; 17(1):2.

PMID: 29397046 PMC: 5797388. DOI: 10.1186/s12941-018-0254-0.

References
1.
Rainey P, Friedland G, Andrews L, Mitchell S, Charles C, Jatlow P . Interaction of methadone with didanosine and stavudine. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2000; 24(3):241-8. DOI: 10.1097/00126334-200007010-00007. View

2.
Lim S, Copeland W . Differential incorporation and removal of antiviral deoxynucleotides by human DNA polymerase gamma. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276(26):23616-23. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M101114200. View

3.
Kuczmarski R, Ogden C, Guo S, Grummer-Strawn L, Flegal K, Mei Z . 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat 11. 2002; (246):1-190. View

4.
Calvez V, Costagliola D, Descamps D, Yvon A, Collin G, Cecile A . Impact of stavudine phenotype and thymidine analogues mutations on viral response to stavudine plus lamivudine in ALTIS 2 ANRS trial. Antivir Ther. 2002; 7(3):211-8. View

5.
Becher F, Landman R, Mboup S, Kane C, Canestri A, Liegeois F . Monitoring of didanosine and stavudine intracellular trisphosphorylated anabolite concentrations in HIV-infected patients. AIDS. 2004; 18(2):181-7. DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200401230-00006. View