FEM and Von Mises Analyses of Different Dental Implant Shapes for Masticatory Loading Distribution

Overview

Journal Oral Implantol (Rome)

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2015 Feb 20

PMID 25694795

Citations 31

Authors

M Cicciu

E Bramanti

F Cecchetti

L Scappaticci

E Guglielmino

G Risitano

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The rehabilitation of edentulous patients is today a challenge for the clinicians. The healthy of the hard and soft issue may be considered a fundamental element for having long-term results. The dental implant progresses about the predictable and safe results made this technique chosen from a large group of practitioners. However some problems related intra-operative and postoperative conditions may create discomfort on the patients and consequently to the clinician. The unfavourable results are often related to the bone tissue quality but sometime the dental implant shape and the prosthesis framework may undergo to technical difficulties. The purpose of this work is, through the use of appropriate FEM models, to analyse the effect of all these parameters in the construction of a prosthesis type "Toronto", evaluating all the surgical and prosthetic components in order to direct the choices made by the surgeon and to optimize the distribution of loads reducing the patient's discomfort and having a long term clinical success.

Citing Articles

Influence of Torque on Platform Deformity of the Tri-Channel Implant: Two- and Three-Dimensional Analysis Using Micro-Computed Tomography.

de Morais R, Simionato A, Moris I, Leoni G, Faria A, Rodrigues R Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(7).

PMID: 37512122 PMC: 10386693. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59071311.

Stress Distribution Pattern in Zygomatic Implants Supporting Different Superstructure Materials.

Heboyan A, Lo Giudice R, Kalman L, Zafar M, Tribst J Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(14).

PMID: 35888420 PMC: 9323759. DOI: 10.3390/ma15144953.

Finite Element Analysis of Stress in Anterior Prosthetic Rehabilitation with Zirconia Implants with and without Cantilever.

Tsumanuma K, Caldas R, Silva I, Miranda M, Brandt W, Vitti R Eur J Dent. 2021; 15(4):669-674.

PMID: 34384126 PMC: 8630963. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1727544.

Numerical Analysis of the , with Sprains of Different Degrees after Trauma.

Marquet-Rivera R, Urriolagoitia-Sosa G, Romero-Angeles B, Hernandez-Vazquez R, Mastache-Miranda O, Cruz-Lopez S Comput Math Methods Med. 2021; 2021:2109348.

PMID: 34349834 PMC: 8328720. DOI: 10.1155/2021/2109348.

Finite element analysis of the effect of framework materials at the bone-implant interface in the all-on-four implant system.

Kelkar K, Bhat V, Hegde C Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021; 18:1.

PMID: 34084288 PMC: 8122683.

References

Cicciu M, Risitano G, Maiorana C, Franceschini G . Parametric analysis of the strength in the ''Toronto'' osseous-prosthesis system. Minerva Stomatol. 2009; 58(1-2):9-23. View

Kitagawa T, Tanimoto Y, Odaki M, Nemoto K, Aida M . Influence of implant/abutment joint designs on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005; 75(2):457-63. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30328. View

Moon H, Lee J, Choi K, Choi J, Koh C . Homogenized stress analysis in a dental implant system. J Med Eng Technol. 1998; 21(6):233-40. DOI: 10.3109/03091909709070014. View

Boschian Pest L, Guidotti S, Pietrabissa R, Gagliani M . Stress distribution in a post-restored tooth using the three-dimensional finite element method. J Oral Rehabil. 2006; 33(9):690-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01538.x. View

van Staden R, Guan H, Johnson N, Loo Y, Meredith N . Step-wise analysis of the dental implant insertion process using the finite element technique. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 19(3):303-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01427.x. View

Sannino G . All-on-4 concept: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2013; 41(2):163-71. DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00312. View

Bergkvist G, Simonsson K, Rydberg K, Johansson F, Derand T . A finite element analysis of stress distribution in bone tissue surrounding uncoupled or splinted dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008; 10(1):40-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00059.x. View

Al-Sukhun J, Lindqvist C, Helenius M . Development of a three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible containing endosseous dental implants. II. Variables affecting the predictive behavior of a finite element model of a human mandible. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006; 80(1):247-56. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30881. View

Bozkaya D, Muftu S . Mechanics of the tapered interference fit in dental implants. J Biomech. 2003; 36(11):1649-58. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00177-5. View

10.

Pietrabissa R, Contro R, Quaglini V, Soncini M, Gionso L, Simion M . Experimental and computational approach for the evaluation of the biomechanical effects of dental bridge misfit. J Biomech. 2000; 33(11):1489-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00089-0. View

11.

De Vico G, Bonino M, Spinelli D, Schiavetti R, Sannino G, Pozzi A . Rationale for tilted implants: FEA considerations and clinical reports. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2013; 4(3-4):23-33. PMC: 3530969. View

12.

Van Staden R, Guan H, Loo Y . Application of the finite element method in dental implant research. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2006; 9(4):257-70. DOI: 10.1080/10255840600837074. View

13.

Sannino G, Marra G, Feo L, Vairo G, Barlattani A . 3D finite element non linear analysis on the stress state at bone-implant interface in dental osteointegrated implants. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2013; 3(3):26-37. PMC: 3399188. View

14.

Lan T, Huang H, Wu J, Lee H, Wang C . Stress analysis of different angulations of implant installation: the finite element method. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008; 24(3):138-43. DOI: 10.1016/S1607-551X(08)70141-4. View

15.

Covani U, Ricci M, Tonelli P, Barone A . An evaluation of new designs in implant-abutment connections: a finite element method assessment. Implant Dent. 2013; 22(3):263-7. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318292625f. View

16.

Sannino G, Gloria F, Ottria L, Barlattani A . Influence of finish line in the distribution of stress trough an all ceramic implant-supported crown.: A 3D Finite Element Analysis. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2013; 2(2):14-27. PMC: 3415351. View

17.

Sannino G, Barlattani A . Mechanical evaluation of an implant-abutment self-locking taper connection: finite element analysis and experimental tests. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28(1):e17-26. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2058. View

18.

Roychowdhury A, Pal S, Saha S . Stress analysis of an artificial temporal mandibular joint. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2000; 28(3 - 4):411-20. DOI: 10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v28.i34.110. View

19.

Roychowdhury A, Pal S . A 3-D FEM analysis of single and multiple screw-root dental implant fixed in a mandible. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2000; 28(3 - 4):405-10. DOI: 10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v28.i34.100. View

20.

Michailidis N, Karabinas G, Tsouknidas A, Maliaris G, Tsipas D, Koidis P . A FEM based endosteal implant simulation to determine the effect of peri-implant bone resorption on stress induced implant failure. Biomed Mater Eng. 2013; 23(5):317-27. DOI: 10.3233/BME-130756. View