Information Preferences Regarding Cure Rates and Prognosis of Austrian Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer

Overview

Journal Strahlenther Onkol

Specialties Oncology
Radiology

Date 2015 Feb 19

PMID 25690939

Citations 9

Authors

Tamara Rumpold

Carola Lutgendorf-Caucig

Reinhold Jagsch

Karin Dieckmann

Herbert Watzke

Richard Potter

Kathrin Kirchheiner

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Due to concerns about patients' wellbeing, open end-of-life communication is associated with reservation. Furthermore, sociocultural differences must be considered. The objective of this pilot study was therefore to investigate the information preferences of Austrian patients regarding cure rates and prognosis.

Patients And Methods: The information preferences of 50 advanced lung cancer patients were assessed at their first visit to the Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna. Preferences in terms of content (cure rates and/or prognosis) and depth of the information (additional quantitative estimates) were addressed. After the individually adapted medical consultation, patients' satisfaction with the consultation and the emotional responses to the information were evaluated.

Results: The majority of patients (76 %) requested information about cure rates and/or prognosis; nearly half of these (47 %) wanted additional quantitative estimates. Neither sociodemographic variables, disease characteristics, nor time since diagnosis had an impact on the information preferences. The individually adapted medical information showed no overall negative influence on the emotional responses; only patients receiving prognostic information had significantly higher distress scores after the consultation. High satisfaction with the individually adapted medical consultation was reported by 92 % of patients.

Conclusion: Austrian physicians may offer end-of-life communication and directly ask patients about their information preferences, since patients seem able to decide whether or not prognostic information would overwhelm their emotional capacity and therefore to accept or reject the invitation. The disclosure of cure rates and/or prognosis with or without quantitative estimates-according to the patients' preferences-shows overall no negative impact on emotional reactions. The individually adapted consultation results in high patient satisfaction. Nevertheless, prognostic information may lead to higher distress.

Citing Articles

Timing of prognostic discussions in people with advanced cancer: a systematic review.

Nahm S, Subramaniam S, Stockler M, Kiely B Support Care Cancer. 2024; 32(2):127.

PMID: 38261070 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08230-3.

Information concealment in palliative patients: Development and pilot study of a new scale for caregivers.

de la Piedra-Torres A, Lopez-Martinez A, Ramirez-Maestre C Health Soc Care Community. 2022; 30(6):e4504-e4512.

PMID: 35648619 PMC: 10083995. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13854.

The silent transition from curative to palliative treatment: a qualitative study about cancer patients' perceptions of end-of-life discussions with oncologists.

Kitta A, Hagin A, Unseld M, Adamidis F, Diendorfer T, Masel E Support Care Cancer. 2020; 29(5):2405-2413.

PMID: 32918609 PMC: 7981304. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05750-0.

The Effect of Prognostic Communication on Patient Outcomes in Palliative Cancer Care: a Systematic Review.

van der Velden N, Meijers M, Han P, van Laarhoven H, Smets E, Henselmans I Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2020; 21(5):40.

PMID: 32328821 PMC: 7181418. DOI: 10.1007/s11864-020-00742-y.

Attitude Towards End of Life Communication of Austrian Medical Students.

Rumpold T, Lutgendorf-Caucig C, Loffler-Stastka H, Roider-Schur S, Potter R, Kirchheiner K J Cancer Educ. 2018; 34(4):743-748.

PMID: 29687186 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-018-1366-0.

References

Butow P, MacLean M, Dunn S, Tattersall M, Boyer M . The dynamics of change: cancer patients' preferences for information, involvement and support. Ann Oncol. 1997; 8(9):857-63. DOI: 10.1023/a:1008284006045. View

Krasner M, Epstein R, Beckman H, Suchman A, Chapman B, Mooney C . Association of an educational program in mindful communication with burnout, empathy, and attitudes among primary care physicians. JAMA. 2009; 302(12):1284-93. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1384. View

Surbone A . Cultural aspects of communication in cancer care. Support Care Cancer. 2008; 16(3):235-40. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-007-0366-0. View

Georgaki S, Kalaidopoulou O, Liarmakopoulos I, Mystakidou K . Nurses' attitudes toward truthful communication with patients with cancer. A Greek study. Cancer Nurs. 2002; 25(6):436-41. DOI: 10.1097/00002820-200212000-00006. View

Uchitomi Y, Yamawaki S . Truth-telling practice in cancer care in Japan. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997; 809:290-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb48092.x. View

Schofield P, Butow P, Thompson J, Tattersall M, Beeney L, Dunn S . Psychological responses of patients receiving a diagnosis of cancer. Ann Oncol. 2002; 14(1):48-56. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdg010. View

Christakis N, Iwashyna T . Attitude and self-reported practice regarding prognostication in a national sample of internists. Arch Intern Med. 1998; 158(21):2389-95. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.158.21.2389. View

Gattellari M, Butow P, Tattersall M, Dunn S, MacLeod C . Misunderstanding in cancer patients: why shoot the messenger?. Ann Oncol. 1999; 10(1):39-46. DOI: 10.1023/a:1008336415362. View

Clayton J, Hancock K, Butow P, Tattersall M, Currow D, Adler J . Clinical practice guidelines for communicating prognosis and end-of-life issues with adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness, and their caregivers. Med J Aust. 2007; 186(S12):S77-S105. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01100.x. View

10.

Laine C, Davidoff F . Patient-centered medicine. A professional evolution. JAMA. 1996; 275(2):152-6. View

11.

VandeKieft G . Breaking bad news. Am Fam Physician. 2002; 64(12):1975-8. View

12.

Hagerty R, Butow P, Ellis P, Lobb E, Pendlebury S, Leighl N . Cancer patient preferences for communication of prognosis in the metastatic setting. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(9):1721-30. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.095. View

13.

Mystakidou K, Parpa E, Tsilila E, Katsouda E, Vlahos L . Cancer information disclosure in different cultural contexts. Support Care Cancer. 2004; 12(3):147-54. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-003-0552-7. View

14.

Aaronson N, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez N . The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85(5):365-76. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365. View

15.

Barnett M . Effect of breaking bad news on patients' perceptions of doctors. J R Soc Med. 2002; 95(7):343-7. PMC: 1279938. DOI: 10.1177/014107680209500706. View

16.

Chochinov H, Tataryn D, Wilson K, Ennis M, Lander S . Prognostic awareness and the terminally ill. Psychosomatics. 2000; 41(6):500-4. DOI: 10.1176/appi.psy.41.6.500. View

17.

Temel J, Greer J, Muzikansky A, Gallagher E, Admane S, Jackson V . Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(8):733-42. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000678. View

18.

Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P . Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012; 27(10):1361-7. PMC: 3445676. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6. View

19.

The A, Hak T, Koeter G, van der Wal G . Collusion in doctor-patient communication about imminent death: an ethnographic study. West J Med. 2001; 174(4):247-53. PMC: 1071348. DOI: 10.1136/ewjm.174.4.247. View

20.

Huang X, Butow P, Meiser B, Goldstein D . Attitudes and information needs of Chinese migrant cancer patients and their relatives. Aust N Z J Med. 1999; 29(2):207-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1999.tb00685.x. View